citytill1die84 said:
mancity1 said:
Just means Dzeko hasn't played this game that's all.
Mancini has said he is a required player that means a little more to me than Dzeko not playing this friendly.
Savic has played the full 90 minutes does that mean he is staying with us (LOL)?
Don't read anything into who plays this game and who doesn't.
These games are basically designed to give our youngsters some game time.
Yea every player that's gone over there has had game time other than Dzeko that to me says something is wrong. I'd understand if he was injured and if it's just a work out for the kids but Aguero,Yaya,Kompany & Tevez wouldn't of been risked.
Your reading too much into Dzeko not playing yet.
He could have played the full 180 minutes and it would have no bearing on his current status at the club.
Mancini wanted Dzeko in fact it was his first major signing up front.
He goal to game time ratio is excellent and we have nobody else who has his attributes.
Getting the width we need out wide will only make him more dangerous than he already is.
It could be the case that Dzeko is a little pieved at his lack of game time in the run in to the title but as I said unless we have someone who is proven to do the business for us in the premiership that will provide more value to the team in both the short and long term already on board I would be surprised if Mancini would sanction Dzeko's departure.
I wouldn't change our strikers for anybody else currently in the premiership.
They all played a pivotal role in us getting over the line last season and will do so again this season which we all agree will be harder to win than last season.