Everytime City has a poor game, regardless of who played poorly, the same tired suggestions of starting Lescott and Milner pops up. Milner started against Aston Villa and had a mare. Lescott against Hull and looked lost. It must be a subconscious English pride thing. Cuz there frankly is no reason to sub Nastasic. Had a good game all things considered. Milner I understand. Not because i except anything better, as he is decidedly average. Lots of braun with little tactical IQ. But against midrange English club and being the most rested WM I can see the logic. Let him bring that effort that is so loved.
The calls for Lescott on the other hand are simply unjustified. Unless Nasty is hurt or playing poorly, which neither is the case, there is no justification for starting an inferior player. CDs generally can handle multiple games, as they are not as knackered as mids and forwards.
Lescott would probably not start on Saturday coz he doesn't deserve to supplant a player playing well. Milner, Jovetic and SIlva might.
The calls for Lescott on the other hand are simply unjustified. Unless Nasty is hurt or playing poorly, which neither is the case, there is no justification for starting an inferior player. CDs generally can handle multiple games, as they are not as knackered as mids and forwards.
Lescott would probably not start on Saturday coz he doesn't deserve to supplant a player playing well. Milner, Jovetic and SIlva might.