City vs Fullham Post Match Discussion

[gravediggerj]

Why is fulham at home always freezing?

 

[WNRH]

The fact that we look so comfortable today shows how utterly pathetic Fulham were. It really should have been 4/5-0 minimum. Wasted opportunity but would have taken a 1-0 win before the game as 3 points really is all that matters.

 

[kunaguero10]

Shite performance, i couldn't help but come away feeling a bit disappointed.

Champions don't win a game 2-0 at home after scoring in the 2nd minute. Really should have showed more impetus and played how we can.

im looking for a word


cock

thats it


spoilt cock

so seeing the english champions play at only 60% of their ability was acceptable was it?

 

[robbieh]

Shite performance, i couldn't help but come away feeling a bit disappointed.

Champions don't win a game 2-0 at home after scoring in the 2nd minute. Really should have showed more impetus and played how we can.

im looking for a word


cock

thats it


spoilt cock

so seeing the english champions play at only 60% of their ability was acceptable was it?

In fact yes it is. From Liverpool in the eighties to United more recently champions don't always play at 100%.

Personally thought we played well. Got ahead never looked like conceding, could have won 4 nil. That is what champions look like.

 

[blueinsa]

Shite performance, i couldn't help but come away feeling a bit disappointed.

Champions don't win a game 2-0 at home after scoring in the 2nd minute. Really should have showed more impetus and played how we can.

im looking for a word


cock

thats it


spoilt cock

so seeing the english champions play at only 60% of their ability was acceptable was it?

Seeing them win 2-0, keeping another clean sheet, seeing them keep the pressure on the rags was more than acceptable for me.

 

[kunaguero10]

im looking for a word


cock

thats it


spoilt cock

so seeing the english champions play at only 60% of their ability was acceptable was it?

In fact yes it is. From Liverpool in the eighties to United more recently champions don't always play at 100%.

Personally thought we played well. Got ahead never looked like conceding, could have won 4 nil. That is what champions look like.

apart from when they hit the post i assume?

considering we won the league on goal difference, we seem happy to do the bare minimum all of a sudden

 

[blueinsa]

so seeing the english champions play at only 60% of their ability was acceptable was it?

In fact yes it is. From Liverpool in the eighties to United more recently champions don't always play at 100%.

Personally thought we played well. Got ahead never looked like conceding, could have won 4 nil. That is what champions look like.

apart from when they hit the post i assume?

considering we won the league on goal difference, we seem happy to do the bare minimum all of a sudden

Last 5 games, 5 wins, scored 14 and only conceded 3 and they were in the one game against Norwich.

Bare minimum?

 

[kunaguero10]

im looking for a word


cock

thats it


spoilt cock

so seeing the english champions play at only 60% of their ability was acceptable was it?

In fact yes it is. From Liverpool in the eighties to United more recently champions don't always play at 100%.

Personally thought we played well. Got ahead never looked like conceding, could have won 4 nil. That is what champions look like.

why the obsession with a clean sheet?

i'd rather go for it, score 4 and concede one than sit back and win 2-0<br /><br />-- Sat Jan 19, 2013 8:20 pm --<br /><br />

In fact yes it is. From Liverpool in the eighties to United more recently champions don't always play at 100%.

Personally thought we played well. Got ahead never looked like conceding, could have won 4 nil. That is what champions look like.

apart from when they hit the post i assume?

considering we won the league on goal difference, we seem happy to do the bare minimum all of a sudden

Last 5 games, 5 wins, scored 14 and only conceded 3 and they were in the one game against Norwich.

Bare minimum?

during the Arsenal game we looked scared to attack after going 2-0 up (which was dangerous to do so early in the game) and today we didn't try to play i felt. This timidness is a bit worrying, and a sign that we are not as good as we were last year.

 

[Anonymous]

It certainly wasn't 'vintage City' .... aside from the last 20 minutes or so we lacked flair , and much of our play , and Fulhams too for that matter , was pretty mundane.

Aside from the goals , i think this game will be forgotten pretty quickly ...

We really should have added to the two Silva goals , but we didn't .... and that must frustrate the hell out of Mancini .... we made such hard work of it against a Fulham side who proved no threat whatsoever , and that , after us scoring in the opening two or three minutes !

But we got the points at the end of the day , that was THE most important thing , and , let's face it , we simply aren't gonna produce a classic performance every week , are we ??

 

[stan bowles]

Shite performance, i couldn't help but come away feeling a bit disappointed.

Champions don't win a game 2-0 at home after scoring in the 2nd minute. Really should have showed more impetus and played how we can.

If we create as many clear cut chances in every game as we did today then I won't be complaining. Another goal or two today and everyone would have been raving. Once we got the second today we played some lovely football and only the finishing stopped it from being a thrashing for them.