CL Final Venue | Stade de France named as new venue

Bluebeemer said:
No way is UEFA going to move the CL final from St. Petersburg; Gazprom is a major sponsor, if not THE major sponsor. Gazprom is run and owned by the same ex-KGB thugs who are now led by Putin and his cronies. Gazprom has it's roots in St. Petersburg, Putin and his cronies also have their roots there, it is where they learnt to launder money from illegal oil trading, then fraudulently gain control of Russia's banking system and natural resource industries.
We should know by now that UEFA belongs to the same club as the all the other hapless corrupt international organisations, where ethics, fair play and decency are inconvenient obstacles to be navigated around.
Click to expand...
Don't think my Baltic cruise in May will be calling in there if things don't get sorted out pronto.
 
Bluebeemer said:
No way is UEFA going to move the CL final from St. Petersburg; Gazprom is a major sponsor, if not THE major sponsor. Gazprom is run and owned by the same ex-KGB thugs who are now led by Putin and his cronies. Gazprom has it's roots in St. Petersburg, Putin and his cronies also have their roots there, it is where they learnt to launder money from illegal oil trading, then fraudulently gain control of Russia's banking system and natural resource industries.
We should know by now that UEFA belongs to the same club as the all the other hapless corrupt international organisations, where ethics, fair play and decency are inconvenient obstacles to be navigated around.
Click to expand...
They're not the sole sponsor, nobody is going to want to be associated with Russia. The likes of Sony, Pepsi, mastercard, Adidas and all the other major sponsors aren't going to be best pleased with the shit they'll get for sponsoring a tournament whose final is in Russia and could easily put pressure on UEFA to move it no matter what Gazprom want if they choose to. We all know money talks with UEFA and if more money is on the side of moving it, they'll move it.

As you mentioned, nobody moved the sochi winter Olympics back in 2014 after crimea and the lack of action back then is now being used to show what happens when you offer such a weak response, they'll be a stronger response this time, there has to be.

Nobody will even be allowed to travel to Russia come May at this rate, UEFA will move it.
 
Bluebeemer said:
The IOC still held the Sochi Winter Olympics after Russia seized Crimea. If UEFA did move the CL final from St. Petersburg as a result of Russian aggression against the Ukraine then the UEFA personnel making that decision would become prime targets for a dose of Novachek, or simply a bullet. That is how the current regime in Russia operates.
Make no mistake on the powers at work in the Kremlin. Make no mistake either on the snowflakes at UEFA.
Click to expand...

Point of order. The Sochi winter Olympics lasted from 7 to 23 February 2014 and the Russian troops went into Crimea on 27 February. They deliberately waited until the Sochi event was over.

Moving the CL final seems inevitable. As someone who lives and works in St Petersburg, I'd suggest that his native city losing the right fo host the final would piss the Russian President off more than most of the economic sanctions the west is likely to impose on him. For that reason, it has to be the right decision (even though I'd love loved to see City in that match a few miles from where I live).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.