Clarkson. Finished?

I'll be sure to remind the next woman I verbally abuse to get a sense of humour and stop being so left wing.

Out of interest, we have many threads in here where females are the subject of dogs abuse.

Are they wrong or are they ok because of who they are and because you might not like them or disagree with them?

For what it’s worth, I’m fine with them but are you given such a strong statement?
 
Out of interest, we have many threads in here where females are the subject of dogs abuse.

Are they wrong or are they ok because of who they are and because you might not like them or disagree with them?

For what it’s worth, I’m fine with them but are you given such a strong statement?
I don't know which threads you're referring to, but no, I wouldn't want to have any involvement in a thread that abuses women. Why would any man want to do that?

I mentioned it the other day but the article affected me for personal reasons, which I won't elaborate on. Men bullying women fucks me off, and I construed Clarkson's article as bullying. If others didn't and construed it as humour, that's fair enough, but that's an interpretation I can't get my head around. I also think it's sad that some on here are equating left wing ideals and taking offence to a woman being unjustly abused online.
 
I popped in and there’s nothing safe about it!
I have been informed there has been a series made to highlight the court case of the century. I wonder which actor has taken on the complex Wayne Rooney role. A bafta must be in the offing.

I think Mary Berry is playing one of his lovers along with Su Pollard.
 
Clarkson’s whole modus operandi, in his newspaper column at least, is to be as obnoxious as possible and evidently there are plenty of people who still lap his shit up. The comments about Markle obviously crossed a line though, hence why the column was pulled and why it’s been so widely condemned. Presumably no right-thinking person would actually defend what he said. Ridiculous that even The Sun actually saw fit to publish it in the first place really, but here we are.
 
Clarkson’s whole modus operandi, in his newspaper column at least, is to be as obnoxious as possible and evidently there are plenty of people who still lap his shit up. The comments about Markle obviously crossed a line though, hence why the column was pulled and why it’s been so widely condemned. Presumably no right-thinking person would actually defend what he said. Ridiculous that even The Sun actually saw fit to publish it in the first place really, but here we are.
Jeez, you wouldn’t have lasted 5 mins on the Kippax back in the day...
 
Jeez, you wouldn’t have lasted 5 mins on the Kippax back in the day...
giphy.webp
 
Anyone offended by Clarkson wouldn't have lasted 5 minutes on the Kippax in the 1960's without bursting into tears.
Slight difference in it being said unrecorded between lads on a football terrace, and one of the most famous journo's in Britain writing it as his opinion in Britains biggest selling "news"paper.

I've seen what seems like a million articles trashing MM in the UK media, JC's was the worst I've seen....can't imagine how the young woman feels about it all. The hate for her in the UK led by blokes like JC and Piers Morgan etc. is pretty much unexplainable.

60 odd year old, intelligent guy writing that ? IMO Clarkson should be ashamed of himself.
 
Stupid twat was obviously attempting to use idiotic hyperbole for comedic effect.

Unfortunately for him and his career it wasn’t remotely funny which meant it just looked like vile abuse.
 
So lets try and put things in perspective:

Lefty 'Lord' Tom Watson wrongly smears Tory politician with vile child abuser accusations that cause very serious distress to him and his wife and family for many years (using parliamentary privilege to do so) and after seven years he eventually apologises. Not a mention of it on here. Not a solitary word.

Right wing 'celebrity' makes a few jokes in a newspaper article about an American 'actress' who married into the royal family for money then single handedly vilifies it and tries to destroy it from within and 20,000 people make a formal complaint and it gets its own 25 page thread on BlueLoon.

What a fucked up sense of priorities this place has...
 
So lets try and put things in perspective:

Lefty 'Lord' Tom Watson wrongly smears Tory politician with vile child abuser accusations that cause very serious distress to him and his wife and family for many years (using parliamentary privilege to do so) and after seven years he eventually apologises. Not a mention of it on here. Not a solitary word.

Right wing 'celebrity' makes a few jokes in a newspaper article about an American 'actress' who married into the royal family for money then single handedly vilifies it and tries to destroy it from within and 20,000 people make a formal complaint and it gets its own 25 page thread on BlueLoon.

What a fucked up sense of priorities this place has...
Well the 1st thing you mentioned is entirely unrelated. But if you feel it needs s discussion why not start a thread? We get plenty of threads on right wing BS. The Harry Meghan fuss for a start.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top