Clattenburg, the FA & Adebayor - proof that the system is bent

manimanc said:
Here's another rule that has been "altered" to suit certain players. The rule being foul and abusive language directed at a referee is a straight red card. Forget about last season and the 38 times rooney did it. This year he has done it twice and not a hint of a caution. Strange!!
Click to expand...

Didn't they once call it 'RESPECT' as well?
 
Always knew there was something dodgy about that Adebayor ban.

Funnily enough I'm sure he missed the derby as well from being banned.
 
I said at the time of the latest incident that there was corruption within the system and the media play the part in helping this.

Did Kun deserve to be red carded for the "elbowing" - potentially/probably yes - hard to determine whether he meant it or not but there is a strong possibility of it...so a red card could easily have been issued on the day.

Did the ref see it - absolutely fucking yes he did - but he has LIED so the FA can then retrospectively ban Kun......he saw it happen and got the call wrong but has then lied because of the media pressure and the dodgy loophole which the corrupt FA exploit.

This rule of retrospectively banning players needs to be looked at....especially when the video evidence clearly shows the ref directly looking at the incident. Of course it can be used when the ref isn't or his vision of an incident is impaired by being the wrong side of something or players being too far away or other players being in the way etc....but on incidents like this where he is no more than 5-6 yds away has a clear line of sight of the incident and is looking at the incident then you should not be allowed to lie to make up for your mistake so a player can get banned.....who are the people putting the pressure on these ref's to change their stories ? where do their allegiances lie - that needs to be questioned as a matter of absolute urgency as their decisions are effecting the potential outcomes of games and that is purely wrong and corrupt.
 
The worst refereeing performance I have ever seen was the one from Clattenburg for the Chelsea v Rags match in 2012/13. It was a very important match as Chelsea would have gone top, with us 2nd and the rags would have gone 4 points behind. Chelsea were bossing the game until Clattenburg game some unbelievable decisions, reducing Chelsea to 9 men and the rags went top. The rest is history.

I remember thinking this guy makes so many bad, game changing decisions in the most important matches yet continued to get picked for them ! We were still in with a shout last season until that "penalty" against Spurs last season. Ok we wouldnt have gone on to win the league but that game practically put the last nail in the coffin. I don't think anyone else in the ground or even watching on TV thought it was a penalty except Clattenburg. Yet he goes on to officiate more big games and gets rewarded with being the FAs representative at the international tournaments.

It's obvious he and the FA are bent. The fact that he makes so many wrong, controversial decisions in the biggest games yet continues to be their go-to ref for those games suggests he is making those decisions under orders. The OP doesn't surprise me in the slightest.
 
manimanc said:
They did indeed. The fact he's the England captain let's him get away with absolute murder on the pitch. How can the FA ban their captain? Wouldn't look very good would it.
Click to expand...


If they enforced the rule, he would be sent off in almost every game - always down the referee's ear and generally swearing at him too.
 
Anyone remember Gerrards V sign at Mariner 2010 v Wigan that he apparently didn't see but Gerrard escaped any punishment.
Its bent as was proved when another England captain shearer escaped punishment for kicking Neil Lennon in the head!
 
simon23 said:
I said at the time of the latest incident that there was corruption within the system and the media play the part in helping this.

Did Kun deserve to be red carded for the "elbowing" - potentially/probably yes - hard to determine whether he meant it or not but there is a strong possibility of it...so a red card could easily have been issued on the day.

Did the ref see it - absolutely fucking yes he did - but he has LIED so the FA can then retrospectively ban Kun......he saw it happen and got the call wrong but has then lied because of the media pressure and the dodgy loophole which the corrupt FA exploit.

This rule of retrospectively banning players needs to be looked at....especially when the video evidence clearly shows the ref directly looking at the incident. Of course it can be used when the ref isn't or his vision of an incident is impaired by being the wrong side of something or players being too far away or other players being in the way etc....but on incidents like this where he is no more than 5-6 yds away has a clear line of sight of the incident and is looking at the incident then you should not be allowed to lie to make up for your mistake so a player can get banned.....who are the people putting the pressure on these ref's to change their stories ? where do their allegiances lie - that needs to be questioned as a matter of absolute urgency as their decisions are effecting the potential outcomes of games and that is purely wrong and corrupt.
Click to expand...
Good points,but the media outrage on this hasn't really registered on the Richter scale strange isn't it ..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.