Clattenburg (Update p59 - not selected next weekend)

Re: Clattenburg

Very interesting the allegations about racism coming out. I wonder if Chelsea just feel this is the easiest way to get at Clattenburg? Because the 'bent as fuck' angle clearly isn't going to gain any traction what so ever.
 
Re: Clattenburg

I hope this **** gets sacked but I won't hold my fucking breath. I've always hated Clattenberg more than any other Ref. if he does get sacked hopefully other refs will think about what they do in future. Said yesterday I wouldn't be bothered if The Rags won as u always chase who's in top spot but the way the lost I felt sorry for them. The thing that's really pisses me off is how them twats can turn around to me and say ha u struggled at home to Swansea and we beat the European champs on there own ground YCNMIU.
 
Re: Clattenburg

Why are all those emphasising the fact that Torres could have stayed on his feet not saying the same thing about Ashley Young ?
 
Re: Clattenburg

Hamann Pineapple said:
Why are all those emphasising the fact that Torres could have stayed on his feet not saying the same thing about Ashley Young ?

Because we know Young can't stay on his feet. It's not his fault. He's gravitationally challenged.
 
Re: Clattenburg

Hamann Pineapple said:
Why are all those emphasising the fact that Torres could have stayed on his feet not saying the same thing about Ashley Young ?


young wasnt on a yellow
 
Re: Clattenburg

r.soleofsalford said:
Markt85 said:
Hamann Pineapple said:
Why are all those emphasising the fact that Torres could have stayed on his feet not saying the same thing about Ashley Young ?


young wasnt on a yellow


i think your missing the point


Personally i dont blame Torres for going down, he got caught, he had no where to go.

But if lets say, any simulation would result in a 5 match ban ... i doubt he would of went down
 
Re: Clattenburg

stony said:
DaveTheYid said:
Chelsea's 9 remaining players on the pitch cost more than the 11 united players on the pitch in terms of transfer fee's and wages so Chelsea still should have won.

No point blaming the ref.

You are either very stupid or a troll. If it's the later, I'm quickly becoming bored by it.

He's an Arsenal supporting WUM/Troll,and like yourself,many of us are bored silly with the fool.
 
Re: Clattenburg

adrianr said:
Very interesting the allegations about racism coming out. I wonder if Chelsea just feel this is the easiest way to get at Clattenburg? Because the 'bent as fuck' angle clearly isn't going to gain any traction what so ever.


It will be interesting to hear what the other miked up officials have to say.

To be honest I would have expected a much more outraged reaction from the Chelsea players at the time if the ref had used the alleged language. They were wound up by the sending off but didnt have the shocked and outraged expressions that you would expect from players that had been racially abused, or players that had heard their teammates being racially abused.
 
Re: Clattenburg

DaveTheYid said:
Chelsea's 9 remaining players on the pitch cost more than the 11 united players on the pitch in terms of transfer fee's and wages so Chelsea still should have won.

No point blaming the ref.

How does this guy put his socks and shoes on?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.