Mancio said:just out of curiosity , since the 6-1 demolition derby how many times have we been refereed by clattemburg , and how many times has the rag been ?
The cookie monster said:On your large agenda thread last year when you listed about 20 reasons city would be stopped from winning the league...de niro said:The cookie monster said:Coming from the guy who said the ivory coast were out of order for calling up ya ya toure and it was part of the agenda
He had a decent game!!
you didn't answer.
ps why would i say ivory coast were out of order, dont like it but its their preogative.
You list me clattenburgs mistakes then?
waspish said:Mancio said:just out of curiosity , since the 6-1 demolition derby how many times have we been refereed by clattemburg , and how many times has the rag been ?
Rags 0 us a dozen times
Mancio said:waspish said:Mancio said:just out of curiosity , since the 6-1 demolition derby how many times have we been refereed by clattemburg , and how many times has the rag been ?
Rags 0 us a dozen times
is this normal? ?
Definite red card Bill.de niro said:I still think the card for jimmy was harsh, understandable but harsh,
Couldn't get a decent stream yesterday so I can't comment on what I saw. However, most on the matchday forum, which can be very blinkered in its views, were of the opinion that it was (just) outside the box.de niro said:...which brings me to the penalty, it was a nailed on pen and he gave it a yard outside, a yard, it was a yard INSIDE the box.
With just the milner quote and the handball quote your post is ridiculousde niro said:The cookie monster said:On your large agenda thread last year when you listed about 20 reasons city would be stopped from winning the league...de niro said:you didn't answer.
ps why would i say ivory coast were out of order, dont like it but its their preogative.
You list me clattenburgs mistakes then?
if i did them all this season it would be bedtime yesterday though he was at us from the off, he carded us and pulled us all the time, yes he carded west brom but nowhere near enough for their fouling. i still think the card for jimmy was harsh, understandable but harsh, made worse by the glee and the speed he went to his pocket.
he wasnt going to book long for the deliberate handball, he booked him for descent.which brings me to the penalty, it was a nailed on pen and he gave it a yard outside, a yard, it was a yard INSIDE the box.
the sad part about this is i only got to find at at knutsford that he was the ref, i was tempted to turn back, the fact that a match going fan feels that way before a ball is kicked is a sad indictment of how that ref is percieved. with good reason.
my guess is you have never watched a city game live in your life, you therefore dont get cheated, cheated out of hundereds of pounds and many many hours travelling all over the country. i wont say never but i rarely miss a game but i'm not going to the london games barring west ham, i'm committed to that with friends, the others though i'll duck. city will still be cheated but i will have saved a fewe hundered pounds to spend on european games. to be fair to twatenburg, foy and webb are are bad.
no agenda? dont make me fucking laugh.
I was at the game and there was a lot of "simulation" from West Brom when they thought Clattenburg would be kind to them. There was at least two incidents that were blatant dives that didn't get punished.Marvin said:I wasn't at the game, but I thought it was another poor refereeing performance that benefited the home team. It was a sending off, and the penalty was too marginal to give, but WBA players were allowed to continually foul City players. They were trying to get our players sent off, and the referee just let them get on with it.