Clattenburg (Update p59 - not selected next weekend)

Re: Clattenburg

BigJoe#1 said:
Quicksilva21 said:
The Crouch decision was a joke, no doubt...

I thought all yellows were deserved today except Mario's first. Once he'd given him his yellow, he could have given him another for sure... I thought the red was fair enough on replay, Tevez also could had a yellow....so no complaints from me considering what he's done to us in the past (Balo red v 'Pool, Clichy red v Arse)

This^^ Milners was definitely and undoubtedly a red card. Mario was very very lucky to be still on the field in the second half - there are many referees that wouldn't have tollerated his petulence.

Clattenburg did make mistakes today, fortunately the big ones favoured us.

That equaliser from Dzeko could easily have been disallowed it wasn't a foul but we've had them struck off before (Swansea last season).

What we showed yesterday was champions form and pure class.

he's a **** and a cheat. no ref can be that poor, he's at it.
 
Re: Clattenburg

Roll On City said:
Quicksilva21 said:
This thread is proof, two people can watch the exact same thing and see two totally different things....

Kinda like a visual 'Stupendous' situation...
Actually this thread is proof, two pretender posters are raggy ... *The cookie monster & *Pigeonho....
What through saying clattenburg had a good game..
 
Re: Clattenburg

The cookie monster said:
Roll On City said:
Quicksilva21 said:
This thread is proof, two people can watch the exact same thing and see two totally different things....

Kinda like a visual 'Stupendous' situation...
Actually this thread is proof, two pretender posters are raggy ... *The cookie monster & *Pigeonho....
What through saying clattenburg had a good game..

if you think he had a good game you must be either.

a rag
a baggie
his dad
or have no fucking clue about football.

pick one.
 
Re: Clattenburg

de niro said:
The cookie monster said:
Roll On City said:
Actually this thread is proof, two pretender posters are raggy ... *The cookie monster & *Pigeonho....
What through saying clattenburg had a good game..

if you think he had a good game you must be either.

a rag
a baggie
his dad
or have no fucking clue about football.

pick one.
Coming from the guy who said the ivory coast were out of order for calling up ya ya toure and it was part of the agenda

He had a decent game!!
 
Re: Clattenburg

The cookie monster said:
de niro said:
The cookie monster said:
What through saying clattenburg had a good game..

if you think he had a good game you must be either.

a rag
a baggie
his dad
or have no fucking clue about football.

pick one.
Coming from the guy who said the ivory coast were out of order for calling up ya ya toure and it was part of the agenda

He had a decent game!!

you didn't answer.

ps why would i say ivory coast were out of order, dont like it but its their preogative.
 
Re: Clattenburg

de niro said:
The cookie monster said:
de niro said:
if you think he had a good game you must be either.

a rag
a baggie
his dad
or have no fucking clue about football.

pick one.
Coming from the guy who said the ivory coast were out of order for calling up ya ya toure and it was part of the agenda

He had a decent game!!

you didn't answer.

ps why would i say ivory coast were out of order, dont like it but its their preogative.
On your large agenda thread last year when you listed about 20 reasons city would be stopped from winning the league...

You list me clattenburgs mistakes then?
 
Re: Clattenburg

I wasn't at the game, but I thought it was another poor refereeing performance that benefited the home team. It was a sending off, and the penalty was too marginal to give, but WBA players were allowed to continually foul City players. They were trying to get our players sent off, and the referee just let them get on with it.
 
Re: Clattenburg

de niro said:
The cookie monster said:
Roll On City said:
Actually this thread is proof, two pretender posters are raggy ... *The cookie monster & *Pigeonho....
What through saying clattenburg had a good game..

if you think he had a good game you must be either.

a rag
a baggie
his dad
or have no fucking clue about football.

pick one.

Genarally he has been poor over the years, that said, yesterday he had a fair game. As he did when he sent off Evans.

I would hate for us to receive favourtism from referees a la the scum
 
Re: Clattenburg

BigJoe#1 said:
de niro said:
The cookie monster said:
What through saying clattenburg had a good game..

if you think he had a good game you must be either.

a rag
a baggie
his dad
or have no fucking clue about football.

pick one.

Genarally he has been poor over the years, that said, yesterday he had a fair game. As he did when he sent off Evans.

I would hate for us to receive favourtism from referees a la the scum
We just need a level playing field. It's not at the moment, but the wins are tasting all the sweeter for doing it against the odds
 
Re: Clattenburg

blueinsa said:
manchester blue said:
He could easily have sent off Balotelli. Even I was getting wound up by his actions and was reaching for my red card. Surprised he came out in the second half frankly.

What for exactly?

Stop watching MotD, listening to the so called pundits, reading the papers and start thinking for yourself.

Balo got a joke of a yellow for an absolute nothing challenge and then got stuck in with a wonderfully timed tackle, cleanly but strongly winning the ball.

Easily sent off my arse!

Absolutely spot on

Long made so much of the second incident Mario's momentum took him into Long his feet were planted it was a collision nothing more but Long and the crowd were trying to get him a second yellow
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.