BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 36,663
Castiel said:The argument that this is down to incompetence or lack of resources (to accurately make decisions) on the official's part begins to break down for me in games like Sunday when there is no relatively even discrepancy. Referees are going to make a lot of mistakes for as long as they're expected to rely entirely on human judgement; but when every big decision, some of which aren't even 50/50, goes in favour of one side in particular - as a matter of averages there is something wrong.seantheduck said:If all teams did that who would ref games? I dont think refs are corrupt or biased....the game is simply too fast and every decision is subject to tv pundit analysis.....but papers love it all as stories write themselves in our 24 hr media circus.
Consider this in the context of the Liverpool game previous, and all the incidents before that and ask yourself; when exactly was the last time United was royally fucked (and I mean fucked over) by an abysmal referee performance? Sure, they've lost games to offside goals and had rightful penalties denied like any other team. But when was the last time they were on the wrong end of a truly scandalous performance, when they seem to be the benefactor of so many so consistently?
On that basis i cant think of one west ham game where the ref has ''royally fucked'' us over ...