Clattenburg (Update p59 - not selected next weekend)

I actually feel a bit sorry for Clattenburg as I think he got the decisions correct.

- Ivanovic was the last man and although contact was minimal he had to go.
* As an aside, I think BaconFace would have gone mental at Young, he was through 1 on 1 with a glorious chance to score but he took the foul. Chelsea are a tough team to break down at the bridge and with 10 men behind the ball United would not have won.

- Torres could and should have stayed on his feet. In real time the contact from Evans is fleeting and Torres thinks about it and then takes the dive. Clattenburg has clearly not seen the contact and only sees him take a step and then fall with nobody near him, Torres has given Clattenburg a decision to make. And I think the majority of neautrals when watching it in real time thought it was the correct decision.

- The Rags 3rd was the linesmans call, and he got it wrong.

The one thing I'll fault Clattenburg for in this game was for not showing Rooney a second yellow after shoving a Chelsea player off the ball. That was a bookable offence and he should have walked.

I don't particularly like the man and I think that generally he is a naff ref but he's being made a scapegoat here and he needs the FA and/or Referess Association to come out and back his decisions.

It's only my opinion but I doubt he made any kind of 'racist' comment. This just smells of a poor PR stunt by Chelsea to deflect from their own shortcomings with racism.
 
BBC:

Sir Alex Ferguson says he doesn't believe referee Mark Clattenburg used "inappropriate language" to Chelsea players on Sunday #mufc

Ferguson: "I've never had a player come to me in the last 15 years and say a referee has sworn at him"


Not sure why the pisscan is getting involved, also not sure why he thinks his players would tell him a ref swore at them, when they spend 90 mins doing it to the ref.
 
Clattenburg won't retire/step down, he'll need to be forced out by the FA or the Referees Union. If he's found not guilty, which I believe is the most likely outcome, then he'll HAVE to be allowed back to referee in the Premiership, otherwise they'll be punishing him for something he hasn't actually done. The one certainty is that he'll never referee another Chelsea game in his entire career regardless of the outcome of the enquiry.
 
Matty said:
Clattenburg won't retire/step down, he'll need to be forced out by the FA or the Referees Union. If he's found not guilty, which I believe is the most likely outcome, then he'll HAVE to be allowed back to referee in the Premiership, otherwise they'll be punishing him for something he hasn't actually done. The one certainty is that he'll never referee another Chelsea game in his entire career regardless of the outcome of the enquiry.

So killing the wiggy bastard is the only way to stop him?
 
TheMightyQuinn said:
Matty said:
Clattenburg won't retire/step down, he'll need to be forced out by the FA or the Referees Union. If he's found not guilty, which I believe is the most likely outcome, then he'll HAVE to be allowed back to referee in the Premiership, otherwise they'll be punishing him for something he hasn't actually done. The one certainty is that he'll never referee another Chelsea game in his entire career regardless of the outcome of the enquiry.

So killing the wiggy bastard is the only way to stop him?

Yes, and the sooner the better. If he's allowed back then it will be to Chelsea's advantage as his corrupt decision making will not be used to directly affect them (only indirectly by gifting United points against other teams).
 
Matty said:
TheMightyQuinn said:
Matty said:
Clattenburg won't retire/step down, he'll need to be forced out by the FA or the Referees Union. If he's found not guilty, which I believe is the most likely outcome, then he'll HAVE to be allowed back to referee in the Premiership, otherwise they'll be punishing him for something he hasn't actually done. The one certainty is that he'll never referee another Chelsea game in his entire career regardless of the outcome of the enquiry.

So killing the wiggy bastard is the only way to stop him?

Yes, and the sooner the better. If he's allowed back then it will be to Chelsea's advantage as his corrupt decision making will not be used to directly affect them (only indirectly by gifting United points against other teams).

A result which would see us as the ultimate losers in all of this as we'd still be forced to endure him ruining our games as well as letting the rags do as they please.

Let's kick Clattenburg out of football.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.