Claudio Bravo

Status
Not open for further replies.
crazyadi said:
Yes another.. oh dear a Blue who won't blindly follow like Rags blindly follow. Couldn't give a fuck what you think bud. If Pep is pushing the England No 1 out the door then the person who comes in better be a whole lot better in every respect from day 1.
Click to expand...
Nob.
 
El Ingeniero de Noruega said:
Yes.i know what playing out from back means. Sure all keeper do mistakes. It hurts when they do. So pep obv dont believe that joe has any chance of getting better on playing out from back hence bringing in bravo.

But dont say bravo dont make mistakes. Last year he did few mistakes but what about this from 2014. Still remeber it.

Click to expand...


At least he wasn't laughing after it went in.

Marvin said:
Going to be awkward signing Bravo and having Willy and Joe. Perhaps we go with Willy and Joe works on his distribution. I am sure it can be improved with training. He doesn't have to be David Silva, he just needs to be competent.
Click to expand...

FFS Marvin are you taking the piss?

Hart is finished here, even if he decided he wasn't going anywhere and wanted to see his contract out he still wouldn't get a game, he's not up to what Pep requires, it's simple as that, and though some find it hard to stomach it's a fact.

aguero93:20 said:
El Moanus Flappus Hystericus, a lesser spotted breed of shrieking harpy, usually found lurking in the depths of the match day thread on bluemoon, although they seasonally leave this territory, travelling to the post match threads in the season of bad results and travelling to an unknown territory that no biologist has been able to locate as soon as the team are comfortably ahead. Natural enemies include El bastardus kolarovus, el wankerus Navas and elderly Chilean men for some reason. Thought to be closely related to the rodent family, in particular El ragus despicabulus, a particularly pestilent and malodorous species of rat.
Click to expand...

Excellent.
 
Joe is part of the fixtures and fittings but it's fact that he's been weak down to his left for years and last season kick after kick went straight out of play or direct to the opposition, I heard many boos and grumbles last season which was in particular a bad season for joe in terms of distribution, he ain't shit far from it but it's clear the averages in most depts will increase positively with bravo in the side, but putting opinion to one side it's the managers call and it really is that simple, if we don't back it at this early stage he might as well pack his own bags.
 
SPIDERBOY said:
Sad thing about this whole Hart/Bravo argument is...not specifically on here,more at work and in the pub,I get the impression a few Blues want Bravo to fail miserably,rather than accept the managers decision and get behind it.
Click to expand...
As I say, they are cunts. Call themselves Blues? Bollocks. No player is bigger than the club.
 
SPIDERBOY said:
Sad thing about this whole Hart/Bravo argument is...not specifically on here,more at work and in the pub,I get the impression a few Blues want Bravo to fail miserably,rather than accept the managers decision and get behind it.
Click to expand...

If that's really the case pal then those few should get to fuck and follow Hart to whatever club he lands at next. Some right softarses about wanting to stay stuck in past glories and unwilling to evolve and trust in the manager who our illustrious owners have worked so hard to get. So by that score not only is Pep wrong our owners are wrong?

Is Hart a top keeper? Yes for some. No for others.

Does he deserve or respect? No for some. Yes for others.

Is Bravo better? Yes for some. No for others.

Is Pep wrong? Yes for some. No for others.

Is Willy better than Hart? No of course not. But looked like he was always willing to try.

Do we know whats really gone on? Do we fuck.

Etc etc etc. Going round in circles.

Bravo's on his way Blues. Not a damn thing we can about it except have faith like weve always done and know that Pep (and owners by proxy) want the absolute best for us. Time to put a plaster on your knee people and get back in the saddle or on the bike.

I for one can't wait to see what happens when we get the team and style of play with missed in what seems like a very long time.

200w.gif
 
I love Joe but Bravo is better than him in every aspect. It's not an opinion or a myth. It's fact. The number shows it. I won't even talk about the passing ability because that one isn't even close.

Joe Hart:

Clean sheets: 42
Goals conceded: 100
Saves: 189
Saves per goal: 1.96

Defensive errors: 10
Errors leading to goals: 8

Claudio Bravo:

Clean sheets: 51
Goals conceded: 93
Saves: 227
Saves per goal: 2.93

Defensive errors: 10
Errors leading to goals: 5

Joe is not better than Bravo in distribution.
Joe is not better than Bravo in shotstopping either (Not even close).
Joe is not better than Bravo in committing errors (Bravo only slightly better though).

Sorry to say but the only people that would say Joe is better than Bravo in anything are us city fans. Outside of the blue Manc, you'd hardly find anyone that thinks Joe is better than Bravo.

The only thing that Joe has over Bravo is that he is younger (29 compared to 33), and that Joe has been with our club for a long time.

I hope some fans can let Joe go if you think about how much better our club is going to be with Bravo.
 
mavsmcfc said:
I love Joe but Bravo is better than him in every aspect. It's not an opinion or a myth. It's fact. The number shows it. I won't even talk about the passing ability because that one isn't even close.

Joe Hart:

Clean sheets: 42
Goals conceded: 100
Saves: 189
Saves per goal: 1.96

Defensive errors: 10
Errors leading to goals: 8

Claudio Bravo:

Clean sheets: 51
Goals conceded: 93
Saves: 227
Saves per goal: 2.93

Defensive errors: 10
Errors leading to goals: 5

Joe is not better than Bravo in distribution.
Joe is not better than Bravo in shotstopping either (Not even close).
Joe is not better than Bravo in committing errors (Bravo only slightly better though).

Sorry to say but the only people that would say Joe is better than Bravo in anything are us city fans. Outside of the blue Manc, you'd hardly find anyone that thinks Joe is better than Bravo.

The only thing that Joe has over Bravo is that he is younger (29 compared to 33), and that Joe has been with our club for a long time.

I hope some fans can let Joe go if you think about how much better our club is going to be with Bravo.
Click to expand...

Spot on. Too many people lost in sentiment rather than wanting us to win trophies.
 
SPIDERBOY said:
Sad thing about this whole Hart/Bravo argument is...not specifically on here,more at work and in the pub,I get the impression a few Blues want Bravo to fail miserably,rather than accept the managers decision and get behind it.
Click to expand...
I've been getting the exact same impression, and I get the feeling that no matter what he does there will be those who will dislike him just because his name's not Joe Hart.

Headlines: CLAUDIO BRAVO SAVES THREE PENALTIES TO WIN CHAMPIONS LEAGUE FOR CITY
City 'fans': "...Joe would've saved four..."
 
I think they'll wait until Mangala is gone before they sign Bravo. The shirt Bravo 20 could be a best seller.
 
City_Sean said:
Spot on. Too many people lost in sentiment rather than wanting us to win trophies.
Click to expand...
There are many on here who want Bravo to fail, it's true. I refuse to believe, however, that many, (if any) are really City fans, and not just other club's supporters gleefully sh*t stirring as usual.

N.B. Has anyone else noticed how ragtop (Media) journalists are suddenly proclaiming Hart to be "the best thing since sliced bread" again, and not the "complete donkey" they were all lining up to kick the crap out of during the Euro's?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top