Shaelumstash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 8,254
This without the crosses is my ideal choice, beautiful badge!
Fingers crossed mate. This core design without the crosses works in pretty much every feasible colour scheme as well. Perfect for the modern world.
When this process started I was really happy because I thought essentially we're either going to get our roundel back, with the rose or rivers, or stick with what we've got.
My personal preference is the roundel with rivers, but if we ended up with the rose, or even stuck to the current badge, I could live with that, it would still feel like a City badge.
As the procees has gone on though, I've become increasingly concerned we're going to end up with some kind of fudge. It beggars belief that some people see the eagle squished in a circle and think it works from a design point of view.
If the club go with something like that in an attempt to try an appease as many people as possible (circle and eagle lovers) they're going to end up with a disaster of a badge that no one likes.
Or if they come up with something like Melbourne's badge with the club name round the outside, then a load of symbols that were popular on the questionnaire thrown in the middle, it will end up looking like a load of fridge magnets with a circle drawn around them.
The club have got to be strong on this. They can't please everyone, it's impossible. The final design is all that matters, the "symbols" mean nothing if the design doesn't work.
It's abundantly clear going off this thread, the MEN and City voice what the huge majority want, it's either:
Updated roundel with rivers
Or
Updated roundel with rose
Or
The current eagle
Anything else will just be a fudge that there is absolutely no appetite for.