Club Badge (merged)

Greater Manchester and Merseyside are admistrative counties but are still and always will be geographically in Lancashire.

Whoa, hold on a minute. Substantial parts of both Greater Manchester and Merseyside were originally in Cheshire and no doubt some still use a Cheshire postal address. So it's wrong to say both conurbations were always geographically in Lancs.

That said, the city of Manchester is traditionally Lanky and I'd go with shire counties over admin counties all day. On that basis, the rose is perfectly appropriate.

Re the ship, shipping brought prosperity to Manchester so that is an appropriate symbol too. It doesn't matter that the ship canal isn't within the city boundary.
 
Whoa, hold on a minute. Substantial parts of both Greater Manchester and Merseyside were originally in Cheshire and no doubt some still use a Cheshire postal address. So it's wrong to say both conurbations were always geographically in Lancs.

That said, the city of Manchester is traditionally Lanky and I'd go with shire counties over admin counties all day. On that basis, the rose is perfectly appropriate.

Re the ship, shipping brought prosperity to Manchester so that is an appropriate symbol too. It doesn't matter that the ship canal isn't within the city boundary.

I take that point I should had said the majority of Greater manc and merseyside were lanc. I know south of the mersey for both were cheshire, I stand corrected.

As for the boat my point was that it was on the coat of arms before the ship canal was built so why do peole confuse what it represents, out trade with the world not the ship canal.
 
Whoa, hold on a minute. Substantial parts of both Greater Manchester and Merseyside were originally in Cheshire and no doubt some still use a Cheshire postal address. So it's wrong to say both conurbations were always geographically in Lancs.

That said, the city of Manchester is traditionally Lanky and I'd go with shire counties over admin counties all day. On that basis, the rose is perfectly appropriate.

Re the ship, shipping brought prosperity to Manchester so that is an appropriate symbol too. It doesn't matter that the ship canal isn't within the city boundary.
The ship is absolutely nothing to do with the ship canal. The old Manchester coat of arms had the ship on from 1842 (which is where our shield comes from) and is described as 'The ship in full sail is a reference to the city's growing trade and enterprise' @ http://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/con.../110209_manchester_coat_of_arms_feature.shtml

The ship canal wasn't officially opened until 01/01/1894 (a mere 52 years later) by no less than Queen Vic herself.
 
How's your reading comprehension?

Nowhere in my comment do I discuss what I think of the badge, I'm touching on whether or not the consultation was genuine or a box ticking exercise designed to give us the impression our voice mattered.

I don't think our input counted for much, the survey was very limited and the new badge was churned out incredibly quickly with no option for a vote on a final design.

I don't think our input counted for nothing, but I think some of you are overestimating how much it counted for.

As to my thoughts about the badge, I'm pretty ambivalent about it. I half expected it to be worse, so I'm happy in that respect. It's about as inoffensive and generic as they could make it though, just a bit 'meh'. I however really don't like the fact there's no inclusion of the words 'football club' or 'FC', and I don't like the amount of Navy accents and the Navy text in it, doesn't look right IMO.

And as to your anecdotes, mine are pretty mixed, as per this forum. Season ticket holder besides me who's been going before I was born really doesn't like it, and we're in full agreement that there should have been a greater involvement of the supporters in the final design, for example a transparent vote on the final design out of a selection of a few.

That'd be real consultation that couldn't be at all accused of being a box ticking exercise, but that isn't what we got.

I'm not up in arms or anything though, just been left a bit disappointed by the whole charade.

You have absolutely zero evidence to suggest the consultation had little impact though have you?

There are people posting on here who were part of the process of consulting the fans, who have a better insight than you or me, and they're convinced the club took on board exactly which symbols the fans asked for.

The majority of people I've spoken to either on here, Facebook or in person wanted a round badge, with the ship and 3 rivers but most were sympathetic to the rose badge as well.

From my own personal experience the club's findings look to be bang on and they've compromised by making a badge to include what the majority wanted.

I've also spoken to people who are apathetic towards our badge, other fans and even some blues who don't care that much and every time when I've asked their opinion they've just uttered "looks like the old one". Which can't be bad thing.

There's some on here making false claims against the motive of the club just because they don't like the new badge, when it's obvious they listened to what the fans wanted. Maybe both the majority of fans and the club wanted something similar.
 
You have absolutely zero evidence to suggest the consultation had little impact though have you?

There are people posting on here who were part of the process of consulting the fans, who have a better insight than you or me, and they're convinced the club took on board exactly which symbols the fans asked for.

The majority of people I've spoken to either on here, Facebook or in person wanted a round badge, with the ship and 3 rivers but most were sympathetic to the rose badge as well.

From my own personal experience the club's findings look to be bang on and they've compromised by making a badge to include what the majority wanted.

I've also spoken to people who are apathetic towards our badge, other fans and even some blues who don't care that much and every time when I've asked their opinion they've just uttered "looks like the old one". Which can't be bad thing.

There's some on here making false claims against the motive of the club just because they don't like the new badge, when it's obvious they listened to what the fans wanted. Maybe both the majority of fans and the club wanted something similar.
I think you could have made 2 versions of that badge 12onths ago one with the rose one without ,I think that's probably the only information that came out of the survey that you couldn't have predicted before hand
 
Why is the Lancashire rose on there?

Ok Manchester WAS part of Lancashire, but hasn't been for 41 years now? are we going forward or going back here?
and correct me if I'm mistaken but I thought us proud 'Mancs' we're very porocial and savvy on the borders of Manchester?
We seem to cherry pick what we think is cool (rose image) but usually dismiss Lancashire as the farmland of inbred pie eaters - very confusing?
The badge of three rivers -blue and white ship (ship canal - trafford/salford border?) is nicer (aesthetically) but as confusing as the eagle.
Why the Manchester bee not make an appearance? more relevant than a neighbouring county's logo.
You're going to disassociate Manchester's 800 year connection to Lancashire based solely on the decision of a Tory from London to win more seats in Parliament?
 
Yeah, like I thought - very confusing, Greater Manchester and Merseyside are IN Lancashire you say?
Two counties in a county? nah.
They are their own counties and have been since 1974the badge is a hark back to the old one and I like it a lot
but Greater manchester is NOT in Lancashire, even Bolton and Wigan aren't much to their apparent disapproval.

City Lancashire? yeah We USED to be, so its a nostalgic badge, fair enough -I like the look of it, and it does improve the 'LOOK' of the badge
but I'd be laughing if I was a Preston or Blackburn fan.
Love the Rose.

Great call City.

Ignore the easily confused.
 
I always find it a bit odd that people are still attached to the 'old' counties. These counties were the definition of administrative areas, put in so the local sheriff knew where to stop oppressing the locals and leave it to the next door thug. It's just that they were set up a long, long time ago. However they were put there by a government, not God, and were just as 'artificial' as any other random political unit.

Any road, the badge isn't perfect, it's not what I'd have chosen, but it's better than the one in place. No badge is going to satisfy everyone, but this is a fair compromise.
 
I always find it a bit odd that people are still attached to the 'old' counties. These counties were the definition of administrative areas, put in so the local sheriff knew where to stop oppressing the locals and leave it to the next door thug. It's just that they were set up a long, long time ago. However they were put there by a government, not God, and were just as 'artificial' as any other random political unit.

Any road, the badge isn't perfect, it's not what I'd have chosen, but it's better than the one in place. No badge is going to satisfy everyone, but this is a fair compromise.

I liked the sheriff of Lancashire
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.