The guy has incredible talent, attitude maybe questionable but 40m for potential is the going rate with a buy back option on top.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Cole Palmer
- Thread starter Mr-Mertle
- Start date
balotelli's back pocket
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 8,540
Brighton can't afford Palmer on a permanent deal, let's be serious.
We're selling academy players who've never played a minute for us for £15-20m a pop.
Palmer would cost them at least £40m plus add-ons and other clauses.
We're selling academy players who've never played a minute for us for £15-20m a pop.
Palmer would cost them at least £40m plus add-ons and other clauses.
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,160
Mitoma and £30m for PalmerPalmer and £30m for Mitoma
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,160
GotHis hair has gotten longer in the last couple of weeks!
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 12,559
Brighton don't have 40m in the bank, is that what you really believe?Brighton can't afford Palmer on a permanent deal, let's be serious.
We're selling academy players who've never played a minute for us for £15-20m a pop.
Palmer would cost them at least £40m plus add-ons and other clauses.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 10,713
That's right. Do me a favor!
Brighton could pay 100m without blinking, they have made a fortune in the last few years and look like banking another 100m from CacaidoBrighton can't afford Palmer on a permanent deal, let's be serious.
We're selling academy players who've never played a minute for us for £15-20m a pop.
Palmer would cost them at least £40m plus add-ons and other clauses.
If we were buying Palmer from Brighton the fee quoted would be huge
If its a permanent transfer it should be £35m.
Only way it is less is if we have a buyback for x2.
No point loaning to Brighton. They have their own young and promising players. Playing palmer limits their own players from developing and increasing in value.
If its a permanent transfer it should be £35m.
Only way it is less is if we have a buyback for x2.
No point loaning to Brighton. They have their own young and promising players. Playing palmer limits their own players from developing and increasing in value.
balotelli's back pocket
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 8,540
Brighton don't have 40m in the bank, is that what you really believe?
Just because they have the money, doesn't mean they can afford to spend so much of it on Palmer. Why do you think they haven't signed Colwill?Brighton could pay 100m without blinking, they have made a fortune in the last few years and look like banking another 100m from Cacaido
Their whole model is built on buying low and selling high.
Just because they have the money, doesn't mean they can afford to spend so much of it on Palmer. Why do you think they haven't signed Colwill?
because Chelsea doesn't want to sell Colwill?