halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,330
Because the club were counting on him to be a first team squad member that would certainly be expected to get plenty of minutes. We would have needed to replace him in the squad if he had gone out on loan. Therefore we wanted to keep him but if not, sell him so we had the money to replace him. I don't think the club were counting on McAtee for the seasons he was out on loan.
It's worked out well for him at Chelsea but I very much doubt he'd be putting those numbers up for us if he had stayed (I doubt he'd have been taking the penalties for a start!). The role he has at Chelsea suits him and not having to play against packed defences every game certainly helps.
He was needed as a squad player so much there was no possibility of him going on loan and coming back a year later more experienced and more valuable? Doesn't sound like good economics to me.
More likely imho Guardiola was being stubborn (his way or the highway) and the management didn't see enough long-term value potential in Palmer. But that's all OK. Guardiola has proved himself often enough and so have the rest of management. They aren't immune to making the odd mistake, though, and we shouldn't be afraid to recognise them when they happen.
And as I said, he is a good player, good luck to him. I like him.
Last edited: