ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,598
Tupac Shakur faked his death. The seven day theory.
Wilf Wild 1937 said:Elvis is dead.
The moon landings were faked for Cold War propaganda purposes and it worked superbly.
The problem now is the Americans have to do it for real very soon or come clean about it.
Yaya_Tony said:Do you actually believe that?? They did it for the cold war, but they did do it. What about the rest of the missions that surrounded it??Wilf Wild 1937 said:The moon landings were faked for Cold War propaganda purposes and it worked superbly.
The problem now is the Americans have to do it for real very soon or come clean about it.
All in my opinion of course.
Compelling as that is, and it really is good reasoning, got three letters for ya; ISSSkyBlueFlux said:Yaya_Tony said:Do you actually believe that?? They did it for the cold war, but they did do it. What about the rest of the missions that surrounded it??Wilf Wild 1937 said:The moon landings were faked for Cold War propaganda purposes and it worked superbly.
The problem now is the Americans have to do it for real very soon or come clean about it.
All in my opinion of course.
The most compelling argument you can really make is that the USA's enemy in the Cold War, the Soviet Union, have never once claimed that the moon landing didn't take place.
If it was a hoax you would think they'd be the first to point it out. They would have tracked every aspect of that craft to the point at which it touched down... just like Jodrell Bank did.
BlueBearBoots said:Ok not the plane one or the McCann one they have their own thread but what's your favourite? Did the yanks land on the moon? Was Marilyn Monroe murdered? What about Roswell?
What others too?
As a kid in the 70's I always believed they landed on the moon but in recent years I'm not so sure! And Marilyn? Did the Kennedy's get rid?
Begbie said:Paula Yates was actually a bishops daughter...
hang on...
AMENBalti said:Begbie said:Paula Yates was actually a bishops daughter...
hang on...
god bless religion
![]()
Of the 4 people in the car, one wore a seat belt. He survived.kalouk said:bellbuzzer said:kalouk said:I don't believe there was any conspiracy involved with Diana's death. I think blaming the Royal family is a bit of a stretch.
there would not be any theories if the official reports were realistic. The autopsy on the driver was 'mixed up' with a guy who committed suicide.
The cameras in the tunnel were 'switched off'
The ambulance took 3hours to travel 5 miles
Her body was embalmed with what appears to be undue haste,
Some of these points have been disproved though,
The DNA has been retested and compared with the drivers parents confirming it was his and he was drunk.
Diana was embalmed quickly because for security reasons they couldn't put her in the refrigerated morgue and her body was deteriorating quickly in the summer heat.
I read that it took so long because the French paramedics did a lot of work at the scene of the accident.
For me her driver was drunk and it was just a tragic accident.
"'Official' conspiracy theory?" Misnomer surely ska??Skashion said:The official 9/11 conspiracy theory makes me laugh.
RandomJ said:Wilf Wild 1937 said:Elvis is dead.
The moon landings were faked for Cold War propaganda purposes and it worked superbly.
The problem now is the Americans have to do it for real very soon or come clean about it.
You do know they took mirrors with them on Apollo 11 which they placed on the moon and scientists have fired lasers which bounce off the mirrors back to earth. But I'm sure every single scientist that has ever done it was all in on the conspiracy as well. I'd roll my eyes more but I fear they will fall out.
Nope. I mean the one where NIST still refuses to release its model data on the building collapses. I'm a person of the scientific persuasion, someone telling me to just trust them doesn't go down well with me. I'm more of a show me the fucking money person. I need evidence. NIST, if it has any, won't release it, and the natural conclusion is, they're hiding something. 9/11 was very shady. So many fuck ups and coincidences and record feats in one day. Then the aftermath was equally dodgy, the rush to dispose of the rubble without examining it as was the obvious thing to do. Add up the long strings of oddities and it's all astronomically unlikely so I simply refuse to believe we know everything. I don't pretend to know what went on, and I don't subscribe to an unofficial conspiracy theory because they're likewise problematic, but I know when something looks and smells like shit, I am drawn to the conclusion that there is a turd in the vicinity.Yaya_Tony said:"'Official' conspiracy theory?" Misnomer surely ska??Skashion said:The official 9/11 conspiracy theory makes me laugh.
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:Hitler was in fact the son of Salomon Mayer, a Rothschild, dig deep enough and the evidence is astounding!!!
Skashion said:Nope. I mean the one where NIST still refuses to release its model data on the building collapses. I'm a person of the scientific persuasion, someone telling me to just trust them doesn't go down well with me. I'm more of a show me the fucking money person. I need evidence. NIST, if it has any, won't release it, and the natural conclusion is, they're hiding something. 9/11 was very shady. So many fuck ups and coincidences and record feats in one day. Then the aftermath was equally dodgy, the rush to dispose of the rubble without examining it as was the obvious thing to do. Add up the long strings of oddities and it's all astronomically unlikely so I simply refuse to believe we know everything. I don't pretend to know what went on, and I don't subscribe to an unofficial conspiracy theory because they're likewise problematic, but I know when something looks and smells like shit, I am drawn to the conclusion that there is a turd in the vicinity.Yaya_Tony said:"'Official' conspiracy theory?" Misnomer surely ska??Skashion said:The official 9/11 conspiracy theory makes me laugh.
I agree it could look suspicious, but maybe it is what it was too? Either way it's not an "official conspiracy theory", first word is the giveaway.... No one will ever give legitimacy to conspiracy theories, officially.Skashion said:Nope. I mean the one where NIST still refuses to release its model data on the building collapses. I'm a person of the scientific persuasion, someone telling me to just trust them doesn't go down well with me. I'm more of a show me the fucking money person. I need evidence. NIST, if it has any, won't release it, and the natural conclusion is, they're hiding something. 9/11 was very shady. So many fuck ups and coincidences and record feats in one day. Then the aftermath was equally dodgy, the rush to dispose of the rubble without examining it as was the obvious thing to do. Add up the long strings of oddities and it's all astronomically unlikely so I simply refuse to believe we know everything. I don't pretend to know what went on, and I don't subscribe to an unofficial conspiracy theory because they're likewise problematic, but I know when something looks and smells like shit, I am drawn to the conclusion that there is a turd in the vicinity.Yaya_Tony said:"'Official' conspiracy theory?" Misnomer surely ska??Skashion said:The official 9/11 conspiracy theory makes me laugh.