As someone who knows several nurses and has a very good friend who’s an NHS doctor, this is complete and utter horse bollocks and in paper form, isn’t worth wiping your arse with.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Conspiracy theories......
- Thread starter BlueBearBoots
- Start date
Kennedy- it stinks and there’s more to it, that’s all I’m willing to go toFirst two.. yes.
The diana one ... it stinks , but what ive struggled with is how do you guarantee killing someone in a car crash? Her bodyguard survived after all.
or are you suggesting there was more to it than that she simply died of the impact of her injuries ?
Monroe - it makes sense, she was a liability for those in power
Diana - you’d have to ask why the Queen would risk the entire monarchy to for getting rid of someone who’s already done all the damage she could have, to the crown and I don’t think she’d ever sanction that
In all these conspiracies, you have to ask yourself if the reward is greater than the risk.
Diana being murdered, 9/11 etc. I’d say no.
I wasn’t suggesting it was your idea mate haha.I read it in the Mail comments, they know.
Mail comments section says it all.
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
I would say the queen/royal family would be a trillion/1 shot in having anything to do with it. Just not having that.Kennedy- it stinks and there’s more to it, that’s all I’m willing to go to
Monroe - it makes sense, she was a liability for those in power
Diana - you’d have to ask why the Queen would risk the entire monarchy to for getting rid of someone who’s already done all the damage she could have, to the crown and I don’t think she’d ever sanction that
In all these conspiracies, you have to ask yourself if the reward is greater than the risk.
Diana being murdered, 9/11 etc. I’d say no.
mI5? I dont think thats beyond reality. Just dont buy the way of going about it. Easier ways ... shirley
I’ve not met a single person, or even seen anyone online, who believes the story of suicide.Cui bono.
Hasn't the death of Jeffrey Epstein made 'conspiracy theories' respectable again ?
SilvaisSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 1,795
We need a Bluemoon sub-forum for all the crackpots these days.
How about "Blueloon"
I thought that was what the pre/during/post match threads were!
I remember watching Billy Connolly documentary what he toured the UK and he was visiting Mary n Percy Shelley grave.A homeless guy interrupted mid cue to camera and said "You know Shakespeare didn't write those plays ? " Billy then got chatting with him n think his reason he hadn't was that Shakespeare couldn't have travelled that much to have the expeerirnces.I’ve not read through the whole thread so don’t know if this has been covered but been reading about the Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespeare theory.
There was a man called William Shakespeare from Stratford-upon-Avon, born and died when it’s thought Shakespeare did, but there is not a single shred of evidence that he ever wrote a single thing. No notes, drafts, written poems or plays or printed books have ever been found, attributed to him nor spoken of in his will. He never finished school and was said to be a wool merchant (even his original headstone was a man holding a bag of wool, it was only later that was changed to a man holding paper and a quill). There’s no way someone who didn’t even finished school could write what Shakespeare wrote.
It’s as if Christopher Marlowe used the name William Shakespeare as a pseudonym after he was given the death penalty, possibly faked his own death, escaped to Italy, and continued to write under the name Shakespeare until his real death.
Here is the case:
http://www.shakespeareanauthorshiptrust.org.uk/pages/candidates/marlowe.htm
Forgot all about that. So away read your link. Thanks
AlexWilliamsGloves
Well-Known Member
I know itsa TV show, but if you watch things like the Crown, you can understand how such decisions wouldnt need suggestion/approval/sanction by the Queen...there are plenty enough people around them making decisions that they feel is the best for themKennedy- it stinks and there’s more to it, that’s all I’m willing to go to
Monroe - it makes sense, she was a liability for those in power
Diana - you’d have to ask why the Queen would risk the entire monarchy to for getting rid of someone who’s already done all the damage she could have, to the crown and I don’t think she’d ever sanction that
In all these conspiracies, you have to ask yourself if the reward is greater than the risk.
Diana being murdered, 9/11 etc. I’d say no.
Last edited:
City Hobgoblin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 4,432
Spencer’s chauffeur was pissed and thought he was Alain Prost.