Conspiracy theories......

DJ1

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 Nov 2010
Messages
111
One of the theories is it's impossible to get there as there's a layer of impenetrable radiation which would kill us.

Personally I'd like to see us back there just to do it again. But the alien moon bases wouldn't appreciate it after telling us to fuck off last time...
And if we do manage to get through the impenetrable radiation it's just a massive piece of cheese anyway......
 

Marklr

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 Feb 2020
Messages
1,288
Location
Salford
Team supported
Man City
Isaac Newton, who set back scientific thought thousands of years…

“In his famous Principia, Newton wrote: “This Being governs all things, not as the soul of the world, but as Lord over all. . . . The Supreme God is a Being eternal, infinite, absolutely perfect . . . and from his true dominion it follows that the true God is a living, intelligent, and powerful Being. . . . He is not eternity and infinity, but eternal and infinite; he is not duration or space, but he endures and is present.” [7]

Newton also wrote, “When I wrote my treatise about our system I had an eye upon such principles as might work with considering men for the belief of a Deity; and nothing can rejoice me more than to find it useful for that purpose.””
There may well have been earlier Einsteins and Newtons if religion hadn't had held back science for so many years.

Hundreds of years of being ruled by a bullying, controlling, blackmailing religion that we now know is false.
 

arfurclue

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
1,064
Location
Mexico
There may well have been earlier Einsteins and Newtons if religion hadn't had held back science for so many years.

Hundreds of years of being ruled by a bullying, controlling, blackmailing religion that we now know is false.
Am not sure all scientists would share your conclusions. No matter. But what if the essential nature of a united universe was benevolent? Within that, there is free will to experience life as separate from that unity and thus lacking benevolence? Could/would this perspective bring about new possibilities for healing the likes of cancer (which would appear to be more malevolent than benevolent)? Such a bad thing to explore?
 

Marklr

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 Feb 2020
Messages
1,288
Location
Salford
Team supported
Man City
Am not sure all scientists would share your conclusions. No matter. But what if the essential nature of a united universe was benevolent? Within that, there is free will to experience life as separate from that unity and thus lacking benevolence? Could/would this perspective bring about new possibilities for healing the likes of cancer (which would appear to be more malevolent than benevolent)? Such a bad thing to explore?
I'm sure ALL modern scientists WOULD agree with my opinion. The universe is neither benevolent nor malevolent... it's indifferent. From our point of view, that is.
 

arfurclue

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
1,064
Location
Mexico
I'm sure ALL modern scientists WOULD agree with my opinion. The universe is neither benevolent nor malevolent... it's indifferent. From our point of view, that is.
Would beg to differ. Reading some of the works of scientists quoted earlíer, would hint as to why. But anyway, was looking at the etymology of conspiracy/conspiring and it has this

“Middle English, from Anglo-French conspirer, from Latin conspirare to be in harmony, conspire, from com- + spirareto breathe”

Might suggest that much of this world actually prefers non-conspiracy theories and practices - scientists, religionists, atheists etc amongst them. And ’spirit’ also comes from breath, maybe it is worth considering that spirit/essence (call it whatever) has a role to play in the end of conflict/return to harmony.
 

PinkFinal

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 May 2010
Messages
6,034
Location
Denton
If 9/11 was an inside job the people who are aware of that and could prove it would obviously be in a very very dangerous position. Would the media even break the story if the consequence was assumed to be a mass uprising / military coup?

I've never been convinced it was an inside job but certainly there is no shortage of dodgy people in business, politics and state security.
Just people who'd turn a blind eye for their own reasons. Doesn't even take that many.
 

MaineDAWG2008

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 Jul 2009
Messages
2,014
Location
Rotterdam
If 9/11 was an inside job the people who are aware of that and could prove it would obviously be in a very very dangerous position. Would the media even break the story if the consequence was assumed to be a mass uprising / military coup?

I've never been convinced it was an inside job but certainly there is no shortage of dodgy people in business, politics and state security.
Just people who'd turn a blind eye for their own reasons. Doesn't even take that many.
Dancing israaaeeel ies.... that bit kind of swayed my opinion for sure
 

Don't have an account?

Register now!
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.