03 March 2002
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 236
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Fundamentally we agree, but there is the possibility they run more amok than they have done.Just to be clear, I agree that the elderly, vulnerable and those who care for both should be at the top of any list to be vaccinated. But (to my knowledge) they've all already been offered the vaccine. At the point when we're vaccinating the healthy, low-risk population I think it makes more sense to drive vaccinations towards people who have high(er)-risk lifestyles (e.g. students, factory workers, high-density households) where the virus will spread more easily.
I cohabit with my fiance in a 3-bed semi with a nice big garden and plenty of room, we both work from home in non-essential industries. It wouldn't make sense for me to be vaccinated before a student living in a hall with 20 other people sharing a kitchen.
And they're already running amok IMO. I don't know a single person aged between 18-25 who's actually adhering to any of the rules. Withholding the vaccine as a preventative to running amok simply hasn't worked.
I think you can make subtle arguments for doing things differently, but you can't condemn the way it was done.
I'm fortunate, I've had both doses via work and was probably one of the first in the country to get to that stage so easy for me to say!