Toney’s bookie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 1,720
I don't understand why the "Spring 2020 peak" line is lower than the shown peak(!)
The shown peak is Spring 2021
I don't understand why the "Spring 2020 peak" line is lower than the shown peak(!)
It's going to get real messyENGLAND HOSPITAL DATA
IN PATIENTS
THIS DATA IS FRIDAY TO TODAY
Big numbers now as every region starts adding numbers and sadly North West not falling or flattening yet as I hoped
North West went over the 4 days 596 - 648 - 655 - 703 - 738 V previous week 498 - 514 - 506 - 544 - 531
~
So a rise of 142 versus 33 wk to wk - not what we would hope to see from the NW right now
NW is still easily the highest region which is a concern as other regions are shooting up,
EAST went 102 - 108 - 103 - 117 - 148 - up 46 v last week up 22
LONDON went 411 - 435 - 440 - 467 - 514 - up 103 v 35 last week
MIDLANDS went 389 - 419 - 441 - 456 - 499 - up 110 v 90 last week
NE & YORKSHIRE went 442 - 473 - 511 - 543 - 592 - up 150 v 68 last week. THE RISING CONCERN IS HERE
SOUTH EAST went 170 - 164 - 156 - 158 - 180 - up just 10 v 20 last week. FALLING???
SOUTH WEST went 99 - 105 - 113 - 130 - 133 - up 34 v 25 last week
TOTAL PATIENTS IN ENGLAND HOSPITALS
Over the long weekend went:- 2209 - 2352 - 2429 - 2564 AND IS 2798 TODAY
A rise of 589 just over the weekend. By far the largest jump recently.
Last week the numbers went 1560 - 1611 - 1636 - 1744 - 1888 - UP 328.
The last 7 days to today is up 910 - last week it was 423 - wk before 175.
This is starting to look on track for 10,000 England alone patients in coming weeks as Roubaix suggested and I hoped not,.
Much less sure of that now,
I actually can’t wait to go for a family meal or have a proper meet up with my matesThe only things not open at the moment are nightclubs and larger crowds at events that have crowds. The vulnerable at the moment will be isolating whether we're in a total lockdown or not. Opening up things further won't alter their situation. The majority can't stay prisoners forever for the minority. That sounds harsh but it's always been the way. We could stay with restrictions for the next ten years and not get rid of covid and the vulnerable will still be at risk. At some point we have to.live with it and choose whether we want to live a normal life or not. Everything carries a risk. It's not an easy solution but it has to be done.
I actually can’t wait to go for a family meal or have a proper meet up with my mates
Nah. It doesn't have to be done. It's happening because people expect it. And a sizeable minority vocally demand it, make threats, etc.It's not an easy solution but it has to be done.
Make sure you follow Blojo's advice and don't have a 'great jubilee' on July 19th mate.The only things not open at the moment are nightclubs and larger crowds at events that have crowds. The vulnerable at the moment will be isolating whether we're in a total lockdown or not. Opening up things further won't alter their situation. The majority can't stay prisoners forever for the minority. That sounds harsh but it's always been the way. We could stay with restrictions for the next ten years and not get rid of covid and the vulnerable will still be at risk. At some point we have to.live with it and choose whether we want to live a normal life or not. Everything carries a risk. It's not an easy solution but it has to be done.
Is the lifting of restrictions still irreversible?
According to Saj and BloJo a few days ago it was but now that seems not be the case.
Should we be concerned or is it just another untruth/mixed message/lie whatever.
Fazzakerley.Nah. It doesn't have to be done. It's happening because people expect it. And a sizeable minority vocally demand it, make threats, etc.
The majority think one or more of the following.
A: Well, I guess, it's reasonable.
B: I don't know what else to suggest anyway.
C: I can't do another argument with them, give them their way now, and then we'll do what we have to when it goes tits up, and no-one is bothered about what the vocal and demanding sods think.
It'll probably go wrong, and then it'll stop happening. Like it never had to, not then, anyway.
Because that's the easiest way, politically. It's a mental fudge to say, "If not now, then when". It doesn't mean anything, there's hardly a well developed line of reasoning behind that exact stance, not one that people are into, anyway. But it sort of covers all the bases of the real thoughts about things. It means - yeah, because it's easier to reverse in the event of going wrong, than it is to have a sane discussion about reneging on a promise made to a very demanding minority.
Your kid demands Ice Cream. Every day. For Breakfast. Never shuts up. The more you say, no, the more insistent he becomes. The other kids start to join in. They don't really understand why you don't give it to him.
Whaddya do? Give them all ice cream, all the ice cream you can find, until the loud one eats himself into a comatose state. Then have a chat with the other ones about how daft it is to eat too much ice cream.
Small addendum to that metaphor: Boris is daddy, and he's spoilt this kid. The favourite. The tantrum and fall out if he lets him down now would send shockwaves through the family. No-one is really ready for that sort of upheaval, even the other kids. Even tho it's coming eventually. It's sort of.... not now. Can wait job. More worried about ice cream and enjoying summer. It's too soon. The favourite still has some sympathy from some of the other kids. Let that wear off. The only way it happens, they have to realise it's no good for him to get his own way all the time. And it would help if even he got a bit sick of it as well. Once that starts to happen, easy to reorganise the pecking order more reasonably.
Ice cream!
Eat as much as you want.
Because if not now - then when?