Coronavirus (2021) thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
That doesn’t say vaccinated and given birth does it like I said, you know, the bit I said about defects and Thalidomide… It looks like it’s you who can’t read what I’m saying and have stuck me on ignore because you knew I was going to reply with this. Bye.

Oh I was fully aware of the trials too and know exactly how they work and read the published, yet to be peer review info that came out in November.
Nope it doesn't specifically say given birth but it does reference the birth week. Wonder what happened that week?
 
ENGLAND HOSPITAL DEATHS

25 with 4 from the North West

Was 29 with 10 NW last week and 13 with 3 NW week before and 11 with 6 week before that

That looks as good as we could hope for given the rising cases.


1 was aged 20 - 39, 3 aged 40 - 59, 11 aged 60 - 79 and 10 aged 80 PLUS

Regionally:

East 1, London 3, Midlands 6 NE & Yorkshire 6, North West 4, South East 3, South West 2

The NW deaths were 2 in Manchester, 1 in Stockport and 1 in Wigan.
 
ENGLAND HOSPITAL DEATHS BY DATE

13 Jul added 5 after 1 day (last week - 6 Jul - was 3)

12 Jul added 10 = 12 after 2 days (last week - 5 Jul - added 9 = 12)

11 Jul added 1 = 15 after 3 days (last week - 4 Jul - added 7 = 13)

10 Jul added 5 = 18 after 4 days (last week - 3 Jul - added 4 = 15)

9 Jul added 3 = 24 after 5 day (last week - 2 Jul - added 6 = 22)

THESE NUMBERS ARE GOING UP BUT NOT AS YET DRAMATICALLY AS YOU CAN SEE.

24 as the five day total for 9 July is the highest 5 day total since 25 on 12 April.

But they will escalate further as deaths lag cases by 2 or 3 weeks and cases in the other regions have only started to escalate and we are seeing the early phase of the death uptick outside the NW here Not the middle or the end.
 
Yeah, I’ll read what the FDA say about it for a start if it gets full approval, rather than some low IQ having people on the internet who can sort of read and know Dave in the warehouse who reads the Star.
I'm not sure why you put more stock in what the FDA will say.

Spoiler: they won't say anything, they'll just make a generic statement about the authorisation status.
 
New cases in the Netherlands up to 10,492 today, with 14.3% of tests positive, and the R number at 2.17.

Public opinion now overwhelmingly condemnatory of the government decision to open without reservation, a decision that public opinion had been overwhelmingly in favour of beforehand...
 
Nope it doesn't specifically say given birth but it does reference the birth week. Wonder what happened that week?
Nobody has conceived a child and given birth since mass vaccinations started. What are you talking about?

There are probably 5-10 women based in each trial of 30-40k people for the US pharma companies.

I got to that number from 353k births a day x 280 gestation period and divided that by 8billion people (rounded up world population). It’s 0.018% of the worlds population is pregnant at any one time. So in a trial of 30000 people 5.4 women would have been pregnant over a 280 period (which is also longer than the trial!)

That’s about 17 max across the whole of the trial that has been emergency approved. So at the start of the year they’ve mass vaccinated and none of those women who have had the vaccine have then conceived and given birth (unless they’re severely premature and probably dead) and the “experts” are saying it’s safe, what Mr blocky meant was that the analysis of women who are currently pregnant looks to be similar in the stats he posted.

What I’m saying is I’ll wait and see before listening to unquantifiable predictions on the effect of a vaccine on a fetus amongst many other things.

I work on trust, they 100% cannot say this is safe for pregnant women, but they are. If they will point blank lie /mislead about that, they’ll point blank lie about other things.

Really hope there are no long term health risks with so many having taken it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.