It isn’t the only risk, it may not even be the major risk to public health, but it is the only unknown risk to public health.
Everything else we can quantify, or think we can live with, even though the cost in mental health and delays to other treatments are catastrophic for individuals.
I‘m not saying the approach taken is right, I have no idea if it’s right, unfortunately no one does, but I do understand why this approach has been taken.
I get that. What I struggle with is decades of every principle of public health advice, guidance and recommendations being thrown up in the air on the back of some highly dubious ‘evidence’ from China.
What changed from the WHO, in 2019, NOT recommending, in ANY circumstances of a viral pandemic the following?
UV light
Modifying humidity
Contact tracing
Quarantine of exposed individuals Entry and exit screening
Border closure
You could reasonably argue the precautionary principle in the beginning but the evidence for the efficacy of lockdowns and it’s impact on both Covid and the wider health and economic issues, should be incontrovertible by now and known by everyone.
All we have been doing by ignoring the pandemic plans we already had, is running the virus for longer, ensuring we have more ‘cases’ (which may be the right thing to do), but then panicking when we do, in fact, have more cases!
However, once you get past that, there must be a cost/benefit analysis being done which weighs up Quality Adjusted Life Years and, considering the average age of people dying with Covid in this country is still higher than the average age of those not dying with Covid, is obviously not being considered or, even worse, too difficult for them to do.
At least the government messaging is clear and unwavering after 18 months……..