So, as I read that twitter thread, this shows that deaths are 3x lower per hospitalisation, not accounting for previous immunity differences?
But it doesn't say anything about hospitalisation rates.
The other recently published data, was hospitalisation 29% lower than previous wave, again not accounting for immunity differences.
So that's a best case of (1/3)x(1-0.29)=24% of the deaths in previous waves due to lower virulence.
That's good, but a best case, and we're gong to easily get 4x the cases we had under delta.
And if you use comparison to alpha, when we had lower immunity, we'd get the same death rate as last Jan.
And regardless of deaths, if that 29% reduction in hospitalisation comes through, it's very bad news, because cases are going to be factors higher.
So for me, it's very hard to know what this means for the UK. I honestly don't know if it's good or bad news. I think good, but because Balloux likes it and is no fool rather than because I understand the implications.
Anyone got a link to the actual study, or other reputable commentary on it?