Coronavirus (2021) thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Had booster booked fr tomorrow am but popped along to Whalley Range tennis club today & from asking if I could have walk in to getting jabbed must’ve taken less than 4 mins.
Remarkable.

I did a new gym class last weight (one of those Pump classes) & my arms were already fucked.
Wish me luck tomorrow!

Had a tight sweater on so had to strip in front of the woman administering the jab (she was gorgeous) & I was nowhere near beach ready.
Had to apologise.
 
40% - 60%.

a mate of mine has had 5 false positives this year.

Fake news, they’re more than 80% accurate.

On the flip side, friend of mine had symptoms, 3 positive LFTs so did a PCR. Came back negative. More positive LFTs, 2nd PCR was positive.
 
Fake news, they’re more than 80% accurate.

On the flip side, friend of mine had symptoms, 3 positive LFTs so did a PCR. Came back negative. More positive LFTs, 2nd PCR was positive.

read the fine print.

“The figure for the Innova test used in the UK was 58%. The tests worked best in the first week after symptom onset.”

“people without symptoms the tests correctly identified an average of 58% of those who were infected. However, the number of samples from asymptomatic people was around 10 times lower than from symptomatic people in the studies analysed, limiting the conclusions that could be drawn, said the authors.”

Conclusion. Not all LFT’s are equal. The UK ones are at most 58%
 
read the fine print.

“The figure for the Innova test used in the UK was 58%. The tests worked best in the first week after symptom onset.”

“people without symptoms the tests correctly identified an average of 58% of those who were infected. However, the number of samples from asymptomatic people was around 10 times lower than from symptomatic people in the studies analysed, limiting the conclusions that could be drawn, said the authors.”

Conclusion. Not all LFT’s are equal. The UK ones are at most 58%

And you.


Various studies have put the sensitivity of LFTs – in other words, their ability to detect the virus if it is there – at about 40 to 60 per cent. That sounds unhelpfully low, but it is an unfair measure as it compares LFTs to PCR tests, which are arguably too sensitive, says Irene Petersen at University College London. In the weeks following an infection, the cells of the nose and throat can retain fragments of virus genetic material that aren’t infectious, but that can be amplified by the PCR process, leading to a positive result.

Taking this into account, modelling work by Petersen’s team suggests that a study in Liverpool that gave a sensitivity of 40 per cent for LFTs actually indicates that their accuracy is more than 80 per cent.

https://www.newscientist.com/articl...lateral-flow-tests-for-detecting-omicron/amp/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.