Nah. Certain players have just realised they'll get a decision before being accused of diving regardless of how ludicrous the dive. Fernandes stamping on a defenders ankle, falling over and getting a penalty a case in point.Even with all the absurd penalties the level of diving in English football is off the scale. Players have realised they can con the VAR team because slow motion replays are distorting reality. Certain players just go down all the time. Cheating has been endorsed by VAR. Why the PL is allowing its product to be destroyed like this I don't understand.
How many of them are given to the lesser sides though. It only seems this principle applies to the red shite, anybody else challenging them then it’s a forensic analysis to try and discount it.Even with all the absurd penalties the level of diving in English football is off the scale. Players have realised they can con the VAR team because slow motion replays are distorting reality. Certain players just go down all the time. Cheating has been endorsed by VAR. Why the PL is allowing its product to be destroyed like this I don't understand.
We had just been beaten by the rags, and were only drawing 1-1 with the saints at the time of the "incident".Surely the club should be asking for an explanation of the Foden non penalty incident given the stories in the press.
There can only be one explanation and it is time it was outed.
Sir, you have nailed it in one post. They wanted a closer title race and they hoped we would implode, fortunately we are too fucking good.We had just been beaten by the rags, and were only drawing 1-1 with the saints at the time of the "incident".
This clearly indicates, that the reason they didn't give the penalty is in the hope that we would drop some more points
in this game thus giving the FA, the broadcasters, betting syndicates and of course the rags more chance of a title race.
Corrupt as fuck.
And this will keep going on until there is someone with some substance that stands up and says "enough is enough" we can't carry on governing football this way
Is that true? Is there a VAR commander?Nothing to see here....Just allegations of protecting the "product".
I don't want to link *** *** article because I don't want to give them cunts any revenue.
Yes. The commander is in charge of comms and video and is solely responsible for what replays are seen by TV viewers and any replay the referee is shown.Is that true? Is there a VAR commander?
If that is there role it makes it even more incredible that Madley could b3 overruled.Yes. The commander is in charge of comms and video and is solely responsible for what replays are seen by TV viewers and any replay the referee is shown.
Fuck me. I never knew that. Dodgy as fuck.Yes. The commander is in charge of comms and video and is solely responsible for what replays are seen by TV viewers and any replay the referee is shown.
It was only really close 2 seasons ago cos of some ridiculous decisions going in the dippers favour.Sir, you have nailed it in one post. They wanted a closer title race and they hoped we would implode, fortunately we are too fucking good.
But the fact that they tried shouldn't be forgotten