grunge
Well-Known Member
Whichever figure you look at (deaths, total infections etc), every single EU and Western country has been disproportionally affected globally.
Thailand for example has a population of 70 million and an average age that makes it similar to here. Bangkok is one of the most populous cities in Asia, very similar to London yet Thailand as a whole has only seen 3000 cases with 57 deaths....
They imposed their full lockdown in April, 2 weeks after we did, yet the virus was first detected in Thailand in January, just like here.......
So why does the virus not spread like wildfire in Bangkok and Thailand but it does in London and elsewhere in the UK?
a couple of things spring to mind.
1) Eastern countries are "used" to outbreaks of things and embrase things like masks quickly and still regularly wear them from the 2003 SARS outbreak.
2) Thailand isn't a 1st world country. there maybe loads of cases/deaths going unreported in small outlying village areas.
3) different strains in different areas maybe having an effect.
4)Thailand specifically is quite tropical so high humidity which apparenly is more hostile to the virus on surfaces
5) Thailand disifnected the streets every night ( as did a lot of eastern countries )
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/1881470/army-to-disinfect-bangkok-roads-nightly
Just use google to investigate each country your questioning to see what pops up. that link about singapore was something like the 2nd hit on my 1st search.