BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 26,173
What does it say about false positives?95% specifity 94% sensitivity 95% accuracy and also very cheap by all accounts.
What does it say about false positives?95% specifity 94% sensitivity 95% accuracy and also very cheap by all accounts.
What does it say about false positives?
You said your friend was tested,told he was immune in a quick test in a private clinic in april I think it was,we have had as many bad tests withdrawn here and the state's as good ones,i am not an expert ,i am just informed,put CNN on from 10pm every night and indulge yourself in facts ,watch the select committee with the likes of whitty and co,probably too late for that now If you weren't interested before
If I have a fault it is to worry about people going through and remain going through nearly six months on what I have, idesperately want people to stick to the rules and realize that we are only where we are now if everyone protects each other
There are others thinking this is a game,it is not,nobody wants this finished more than me
The point scoring based on personalities in this thread has been and still is pathetic
Grow up people
It doesn’t have to die out fully, the wave refers to a new peak from a previous (relative) trough.
Just like waves cresting over rocks on a coast — they are still surrounded by water, they are just set apart by being higher than the current average level.
There were multiple recognised ‘waves’ in the 1918 H1N1 pandemic in many regions without the virus fully dying out in between (as a virus is very unlikely to come back quickly after eradication).
That’s not the case, I’m positive and optimistic yes but my arguments aren’t baseless and are backed up by the statistics and opinions of scientists.Educated in covid and respiratory viruses,watching the American scientists and our own,I like facts not happy clapping and hoping all Is over because you want it to be so