They assume viruses are not too infectious when people are not showing symptoms. SARS is infectious when symptoms are not showing. Although this virus jumped species to get to us it is a not too distant relative of the common cold and that is neigh on impossible to contain.So why the fuck has everyone utterly failed with this?
that is what i mean,the human trials are on 1,000's of people,there are no short cuts on that,our head medical guy is saying a year would be amazing but it will be longerA lot of trials work can be carried out using computer modelling and simulations, but where safety is concerned, there is no way of skipping live trials on humans.
I think it may be an even more fruitful fishing technique on RAWK. The ever present tendency to victimhood along with the genuine misfortune they have suffered with the timing of this virus would make for much fun.I don’t want to add to Ric’s bandwidth troubles but a Coronavirus conspiracy thread could be a fun way to pass the time.
So why the fuck has everyone utterly failed with this?
Sorry but a new vaccine has to be that,a new vaccine,new human trials,new licencing,i will leave it there but just don't expect it for a year,other drugs are being looked at in the meantime to see if they might helpAs in some of the trials are focussed on putting the code into pre existing vaccines. That gets rid of a lot of potential complications and can reduce the amount of trials required. That’s what a couple of the American companies are focussing on.
that is what i mean,the human trials are on 1,000's of people,there are no short cuts on that,our head medical guy is saying a year would be amazing but it will be longer
Why do PHE and Boris Johnson keep saying that they will introduce the right measures at the right time? All the measures are needed now.
Sort the testing out. We don't just need numbers we need follow-ups. It's a lot to do. The University of Padua in Italy cleared a Northern Italian town of virus by tracing the asymptomatic carriers. I have just emailed the vice-chancellor of University of Manchester suggesting we do this. Why not?
I’m having yet another final blow out.Why did you keep GDM’s post about not boozing in then?
he is testing my faith,i think we have it wrong and wasted time,for him to say they are surprised at the speed of spread of the virus seems ridiculous when we had time to see it coming and how it spread in china and italy,i was confident till yesterdaySurely you know not to just trust his judgement by now though? ;)
think they can skip a lot of the red tape though which will save months I would imaginethe trials can't be skipped,the safety trials take as long as they tak e,it will a min one year then healthcare workers will get it first then us sometime after,the money is there
because I work there, and I have used PCR kit. If the University of Padua can do it, why can't the University of Manchester?What qualifications and experience have you got to state that?
Why are you emailing the vice-chancellor of University of Manchester?
This is just so OTT.
To be fair, many of us have responded to many posts like that asking for sourcing so it can be determined to be reputable or not and have encouraged everyone to link to articles and reports that reference what they are posting about, when possible.I think you should bring in a rule to link references when posters are stating things as fact. It's like a wikipedia moderator's christmas party night on here at the moment.
Sorry but a new vaccine has to be that,a new vaccine,new human trials,new licencing,i will leave it there but just don't expect it for a year,other drugs are being looked at in the meantime to see if they might help
I emailed the vice-chancellor earlier too, but I got a bit confused about the vice bit tbf.What qualifications and experience have you got to state that?
Why are you emailing the vice-chancellor of University of Manchester?
This is just so OTT.
Have you got a passport to Pimlico?There are strong rumours that London will be under enforced lockdown with the army on the streets by the weekend.
he is testing my faith,i think we have it wrong and wasted time,for him to say they are surprised at the speed of spread of the virus seems ridiculous when we had time to see it coming and how it spread in china and italy,i was confident till yesterday
Have you had a quick glance at RAWK lately?I think it may be an even more fruitful fishing technique on RAWK. The ever present tendency to victimhood along with the genuine misfortune they have suffered with the timing of this virus would make for much fun.
Why do PHE and Boris Johnson keep saying that they will introduce the right measures at the right time? All the measures are needed now.
Sort the testing out. We don't just need numbers we need follow-ups. It's a lot to do. The University of Padua in Italy cleared a Northern Italian town of virus by tracing the asymptomatic carriers. I have just emailed the vice-chancellor of University of Manchester suggesting we do this. Why not?