SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,068
For a bit of flu. It’s madness with spring coming.Well the Chancellor isn't fucking about!
For a bit of flu. It’s madness with spring coming.Well the Chancellor isn't fucking about!
My biggest concern with this is the sheer numbers who haven’t or are unwilling to be tested. So many who have symptoms are just putting it down to a bit of cold or flu.Actually this is quite good news. +73 today is another 19%.
That's the third day in a row it's been in the 17% to 19% range, rather than the +35% range it was a until only a few days ago. +18% a day would mean "only" 12,000 cases by the end of the month, which is actually not that bad, compared to how it could be.
Actually this is quite good news. +73 today is another 19%.
That's the third day in a row it's been in the 17% to 19% range, rather than the +35% range it was a until only a few days ago. +18% a day would mean "only" 12,000 cases by the end of the month, which is actually not that bad, compared to how it could be.
And @Pablo1 and @MCFC1993It’s still fairly meaningless if they’re only testing small numbers
Not been tested though? There are going to be loads of people with this who haven’t been tested. Maybe that’s why our numbers are so much lower
+83 actually isn't it? Think ten got added on overnight unofficially from yesterday's official total of 373.Actually this is quite good news. +73 today is another 19%.
That's the third day in a row it's been in the 17% to 19% range, rather than the +35% range it was a until only a few days ago. +18% a day would mean "only" 12,000 cases by the end of the month, which is actually not that bad, compared to how it could be.
Let’s hope so. Would be great to see everyone taking this as seriously as it merits.And @Pablo1 and @MCFC1993
Yes and no. If there's a whole bunch of people untested, we can assume an awful lot of those are not so critically ill... or they would be in the system and would have been tested. I think they are testing anyone who comes into hospital with a chest infection, for example. So the fact there's a load of untested people, could be a good thing - they could be people who are going to get better anyway and not put extra strain on resources.
The rate of growth of the known cases and the rate of growth of the death rates, and hard numbers upon which we can really gauge how fast it may be spreading.
Actually this is quite good news. +73 today is another 19%.
That's the third day in a row it's been in the 17% to 19% range, rather than the +35% range it was a until only a few days ago. +18% a day would mean "only" 12,000 cases by the end of the month, which is actually not that bad, compared to how it could be.
And on top of this the only appointment you can get in advance with 'out of hours' is the weekend. Otherwise it's a mad dash at 8am to get an on the day evening appointment.Sounds like me at the moment, eventually got a call back 9-10 hours later (last night) telling me to book an appointment with my GP. Rang the GP and they've got nothing available for 2 weeks, so now they've given me an out of hours service.
No wonder our figures reported havent spiked, we're all keeling over at home instead.