meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 7,115
You’ve missed my point about the economy in China.
Like us, they didn’t act quick enough because acting would undoubtedly ruin the economy.
We waited and waited because the measures needed were very strong and economic suicide. It was hard to do whilst it wasn’t ravaging Britain.
Similarly the CCP didn’t want to kill their economy but they covered it up for weeks and weeks, burying their heads and were far more sinister in their denial.
I understand it, I just don’t forgive them for it as it will eventually cost hundreds of thousands of lives.
You’re underestimating the CCP if you think the local government covered it up over the CCP. There’s no way they didn’t know in December and there’s no way they haven’t lied, hugely, since.
I’ve no doubt the West weren’t naive and slow mate, very much so too.
Like I said, that’s a false narrative though that doesn’t make logical sense. You’re saying they are waited and waited but they locked down their country after 17 deaths, given it originated there and so they had no other evidence to go off, that isn’t far into a virus cycle at all. The CCP did know in December, they informed the WHO in December. The studies there were done by western scientists too remember, who the CCP invited in in early January when there had been one death.
If you think they were negligent in waiting, then logically you must think we were far far worse with our actions then in terms of the same. It does need to be reiterated, we still aren’t at the same level of lockdown even now as they were. They chose “economic suicide” far quicker that we have done and our indecisiveness in doing so will probably lead to an even bigger one.