Of course
Which is sad and wrong. They should be allowed to run the Met to the best of their ability rather than be used as political pawns.
Of course
We are on the same pageWhich is sad and wrong. They should be allowed to run the Met to the best of their ability rather than be used as political pawns.
I do hope the Met are true in their assessment of partygate and they are allowed to call it as it is, with no political interferenceWhich is sad and wrong. They should be allowed to run the Met to the best of their ability rather than be used as political pawns.
I do hope the Met are true in their assessment of partygate and they are allowed to call it as it is, with no political interference
You are probably correct, but it's a big gamble. Should it be watered down and then a leak appears to say the Met have done that, then the Mets credibility, as well as Johnson's will plummet further, giving Labour and the media the all the ammo they needSadly, I don’t think that will be the case.
Hardly relevant, when you see someone so clearly not fit for purpose and a danger to our population it is reasonable to commentNot many khans in York.
Why is he personally a "danger to the population" compared to what this current government is doing starving people out of their homes and taking away our rights to protest against it?Hardly relevant, when you see someone so clearly not fit for purpose and a danger to our population it is reasonable to comment