Who knows...got it in his last test. Might have been the start of things to come!
My point on Crawley is that his age coupled with the fact he can play some shots means you have to stick with him. We don't have enough options out there to not give someone with a knock like that a bit of time.
Ideally he would be coming in at 3 after a good opening partnership to adapt to test cricket. At the moment our middle order are all playing the new ball more often than not! He has hit a few 50s but is so inexperienced still the jury is out. I just think he is someone we should stick with and Sibley should be binned.
actually i am sort of inclined to agree re Crawley, up to and including the 267 he was going along quite nicely in his career, i think people forget that a bit as obviously his form since the 267 has been rough as guts.
If one of Crawley and Sibley remain longer term, it would be the former for me. Sibley's shot making is....not good.