andyhinch
Well-Known Member
Pinch hitter :-)And he's just been promoted to No.3 batsman - some punishment that!
Pinch hitter :-)And he's just been promoted to No.3 batsman - some punishment that!
Did you notice that he has lost the swagger he was posturing with in his short innings yesterday?Sure. Clicked on the thread while at work and saw your suggestion that the only possible explanation for Renan not bowling was as a punishment.
Thought it was nonsense. Surely there were more plausible reasons ... such as how expensive he was in the first innings ... until the ball got older.
Next thing I heard he had taken 3 wickets and couldn't resist sorry!
Looked like plenty of swagger to me.Did you notice that he has lost the swagger he was posturing with in his short innings yesterday?
Lol.Did you notice that he has lost the swagger he was posturing with in his short innings yesterday?
Classic management, call him out for the swaggering, make your point. Then demonstrate that point made its now finished with by tossing him a present.And he's just been promoted to No.3 batsman - some punishment that!
I think he wanted the ball to be more scuffed for a leggie.If you had been watching the game when he was batting you would have seen the reason. And I wasn't slagging off his ability only his attitude. My original post was speculating that Stokes didn't bring him on until late to make a point. Or do you have a better reason to explain why he played Leach as the only spinner all morning?