trueblue1972
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 2,050
I bet your fun at parties ;)4 test to nil unfortunately to the Aussie's
I bet your fun at parties ;)4 test to nil unfortunately to the Aussie's
No, just after. When any side loses a wicket at the death it always feels acutely painful; had Crawley gone when he feathered the pain might have been more obtuse and the total could have felt more like England's session. I reckon the Australians will be happy to have 3 back in the hutch, but I think they probably wouldn't have wanted to concede 124 in that session. How the next session unfolds should be fascinating.Did you type that before Crawley got out Gabe ? Defo Aussies session - just.
Already? Fucking hell4 test to nil unfortunately to the Aussie's
That’s arguably a significant improvement on much that has gone before.Weak mentality getting out a couple of balls before lunch. Hate to say it but Crawley looks unlikely to ever be much more than decent
As per my earlier post. I think 150.3 is on par for a good score. On this pitch though its got to be a good score.Honours even. Has the makings of a good test.
That’s kind of the point. Maybe I should have said decent AT BESTThat’s arguably a significant improvement on much that has gone before.