Cricket Thread

Yeah it's harsh to drop Tongue, but Wood is a more proven bowler and that bit quicker. Woakes should have played at Lords in my opinion, but Jimmy hasn't taken wickets and needs a rest so it's a logical choice. At times we've failed to bowl the right length, but Woakes will do that consistently. I see it as a much more balanced side. Pope didn't score many runs in the two tests he's played so far but adding in Jimmy and Tongue as a trio and comparing to Woakes, Wood and Moeen you'd expect a pretty similar number of runs overall.

Good start, let it continue!
I feel that they are trying to protect Toungue' s fitness rather than him being droped id have liked to have to have seen him in tandem with wood also , but we simply can't keep our fast bowlers fit .Saqib Mahmood confirmed to be out again now with a reoccurrence of his stess fracture of his back .if we had all our fast bowlers available our attack would be a far different ( and scary ) proposition
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.