BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Woakes deserved that.
Couple of short bursts either side of lunch hopefully.I doubt he'll do more than 4 at a time so he can bowl several times a day and will be fit for the rest of the series. 7 or 8 will ruin him.
He did, he’s looked far more threatening than Jimmy, albeit on a bowlers surface, I had my reservations about the attack this morning, just need Mo to come on now with some tweak!Woakes deserved that.
I feel that they are trying to protect Toungue' s fitness rather than him being droped id have liked to have to have seen him in tandem with wood also , but we simply can't keep our fast bowlers fit .Saqib Mahmood confirmed to be out again now with a reoccurrence of his stess fracture of his back .if we had all our fast bowlers available our attack would be a far different ( and scary ) propositionYeah it's harsh to drop Tongue, but Wood is a more proven bowler and that bit quicker. Woakes should have played at Lords in my opinion, but Jimmy hasn't taken wickets and needs a rest so it's a logical choice. At times we've failed to bowl the right length, but Woakes will do that consistently. I see it as a much more balanced side. Pope didn't score many runs in the two tests he's played so far but adding in Jimmy and Tongue as a trio and comparing to Woakes, Wood and Moeen you'd expect a pretty similar number of runs overall.
Good start, let it continue!
Hoping he won’t be needed much this innings.He did, he’s looked far more threatening than Jimmy, albeit on a bowlers surface, I had my reservations about the attack this morning, just need Mo to come on now with some tweak!