Your comparing the averages you can't compare an openner with a lower middle order.. Bairstow also doest openWhere did I say he’d open. Bairstow could open, so could Pope. The latter gets plenty of practice facing the new ball already
Need to get Ali off now. He's leaking too many runs
I didn’t say Foakes to open, I said he needs to come in as wicket keeper and one of the openers should be taken out. I’d even consider Stokes opening, his batting is loads better when he has to focus and play sensibly. Crawleys runs at the top of the order won’t be missedYou really can’t compare opening against a new ball to coming in number 6 or 7 like Foakes does,
An average in the 20’s is way below test standard for an opener. Crawley has a less than average technique, a way less than average mentality and is extremely fortunate (a) that England have been very loyal and (b) that there is a shortage of class openers in England.Your comparing the averages you can't compare an openner with a lower middle order.. Bairstow also doest open
I cant disagree with this too much , but it wasn't the point in question . Most openers have lower averages than middle order batsmen, especially against a bowling attack that the aussies posses . And putting a square peg in a round hole probably won't fix the issue . A bit like putting alvarez in goal because we don't have too many shots against us and he needs minutes lolAn average in the 20’s is way below test standard for an opener. Crawley has a less than average technique, a way less than average mentality and is extremely fortunate (a) that England have been very loyal and (b) that there is a shortage of class openers in England.