BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 37,063
2 for 1 in reply156 for Lanky to win, 7.8 an over.
Lanky on top first 6, then Durham got above 10 an over next 6, then tied them back down with regular wickets.
2 for 1 in reply156 for Lanky to win, 7.8 an over.
Lanky on top first 6, then Durham got above 10 an over next 6, then tied them back down with regular wickets.
Lol. No way in a million years anyone would get over 300 on that pitch on the last day. Immaterial now though. 40 runs too shortI'd be looking for nearer to 300, which is both a long way to go, and would likely still not be enough. But it'd give the bowlers something to try to defend.
Doubtful but it’s making me smile that folk on here are thinking 193 will be easy on this pitch. Obvs not really avid cricket watchers. Not that there’s anything wrong with that btw. It’ll be the 8th highest winning run chase EVER on Lords btwI’ve a feeling England will win this.
Which was kind of my point. Set a nearly impossible target.Lol. No way in a million years anyone would get over 300 on that pitch on the last day. Immaterial now though. 40 runs too short
If we bowl in the right areas it’s defo a possibility40-4 at stumps; who's with me?
Nah, we’ll wrap this up today.40-4 at stumps; who's with me?
40-4 at stumps; who's with me?
40-4 at stumps; who's with me?