BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
And we got a very fortunate 4 overthrows it hit off our main batsman. Think we lost 3 in the group, got the bounces for sure
Last edited:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Cricket Thread
- Thread starter Gabriel
- Start date
Do you disregard City’s trophies won on penalties?
Different Sport
The super over in cricket is the penalties in football, So why not keep going to somebody wins like in football
Winning on boundaries is like winning in football on corners, Daft
Do you disregard City’s trophies won on penalties?
by the way what do you think now about our chances in this world cup
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,250
They’re looking slimmer than this morning.by the way what do you think now about our chances in this world cup
Let’s try again.
Do you disregard City’s trophies won on penalties?
They’re looking slimmer than this morning.
Let’s try again.
Do you disregard City’s trophies won on penalties?
No
but like I said we won them on penalties fair and square, The England vs NZ 2019 final was a farce for a couple of things like the 4 of Stokes bat from a throw and the Superover tie ?? How can you win on boundaries scored it is so wrong, it's like saying it's 5 out of 5 for each team, Now we go to how many corners you won ??
A Superover should be a Superover, If the scores are level go again with another Superover until somebody wins
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,250
The rules were in place beforehand. It was won fair and square.No
but like I said we won them on penalties fair and square, The England vs NZ 2019 final was a farce for a couple of things like the 4 of Stokes bat from a throw and the Superover tie ?? How can you win on boundaries scored it is so wrong, it's like saying it's 5 out of 5 for each team, Now we go to how many corners you won ??
A Superover should be a Superover, If the scores are level go again with another Superover until somebody wins
What you want the rules to be is totally irrelevant.
Not so, All I want it to be is fairThe rules were in place beforehand. It was won fair and square.
What you want the rules to be is totally irrelevant.
If the scores are level and you have to play a super over then let the super over decide the result, So just keep playing a super over until somebody wins, Crazy way to win or lose on Boundaries scored.
PS
Stokes 4 off from hitting the bat after the throw-in runout chance should not have counted meaning England would have lost
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,250
It was fair. The rules were there all along. New Zealand knew they had to score more in the super over.Not so, All I want it to be is fair
If the scores are level and you have to play a super over then let the super over decide the result, So just keep playing a super over until somebody wins, Crazy way to win or lose on Boundaries scored.
PS
Stokes 4 off from hitting the bat after the throw-in runout chance should not have counted meaning England would have lost
The butterfly effect of Stokes’ bonus runs suggests you have no idea if Stokes would have hit two 6s and we won without a super over.
However you try to call it unfair and unwarranted, England won the ODI final.
Guess we should relinquish the World Cup of 1966 too as the ball didn’t cross the line.
Why?Stokes 4 off from hitting the bat after the throw-in runout chance should not have counted
Why?
unsporting