chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 27,032
September champions ;-)The farcical first part of the season under a useless coach has cost us dearly.
September champions ;-)The farcical first part of the season under a useless coach has cost us dearly.
That figure I’ve read too, which is incredible for a month’s work, regardless of whether you actually play or not.Guess being a wildcard in the 100 paid better than playing in the second XI cup.
Think I read that Flintoff got £32k as a wildcard.
100% to all of that, excellent post mate.Whilst I agree with the disregard of the cricket, by 'Badly advised' I meant going to watch the hundred with his dad instead of playing cricket in the Metro Cup.
We'd have done well in the T20 finals had we not been forced to play a second string cos the ECB arrange a series of International T20s on the same weekend.
Youngsters get their chance at Old Trafford.
Balderson, Hurst, Aspinwall have all done well.
Add Bosh, Hartley and Bell (a bit mixed to be fair) we do give you players a proper shot.
However, Gidney and Chilton are a disaster. Turned OT into an outdoor concert arena instead of a cricket ground and appointed, as you rightly said, 'a coach who had an unbroken record of failure'.
Parents often have a very jaundiced view of their child's sporting abilities. I' sure that never applyiedin the CLCI hope so to get the snobbery out of Lancs
A number of years ago I spoke to a big cricket fan and his lad was a very, very good player
His dad said that with the right coaching he'd be good enough to play for Lancashire, but it's all about who you know and what school you went to
Better have a go with the lottery numbersMaybe not a surprise that Woakes has been left out due to injury/his previous form in Australia, but I felt like Woakes was their go to man to open the bowling in the post Anderson/Broad era - I felt like they may have brought back Curran if Woakes wasn't to make it - maybe that's curtains for Woakes England career.
I tend to think of the BPs being “goal difference” for cricket. They only matter if the accumulated points total of the wins and draws that teams accrue are similar.Looking at the final championship tables, I see that yet again bonus points make absolutely no significant difference. Why not have a system that actually counts?
It probably was, but any slight evidence that the ball might have touched the ground and they give the benefit of the doubt to the batter.Anyone else watching the women’s cricket? That looked out to me, thoughts?
I thought it should have gone with the soft signal, which given knight had walked was surely out?It probably was, but any slight evidence that the ball might have touched the ground and they give the benefit of the doubt to the batter.
Knight was happy to walk and take the world of the fielder. Guess cricket doesn’t want to get into clear and obvious errors…!
I think the soft signal stopped a couple of years ago. Once the umpires send it to the video umpire, they delegate the decision whole to them.I thought it should have gone with the soft signal, which given knight had walked was surely out?
Yeah you’re right AHT (as you often are, but NOT ALWAYS!) - the ICC abolished soft signals in 2023, fuckers forgot to tell meI think the soft signal stopped a couple of years ago. Once the umpires send it to the video umpire, they delegate the decision whole to them.
Oh dear. India lost.