You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Cristiano Ronaldo
- Thread starter Rhapsody in Blue
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,822
I can't argue with his playing record.
There's just something about him I can't find him likeable.
This is true, it is said he is a decent bloke in life, but he looks very punchable when on the pitch
Lavinda Past
Well-Known Member
I wish he'd get off the fence...So you are not keen then Mat ?
BufordUSABlue
Well-Known Member
Exactly !! He is a right fence-sitter is our Mat ;-)I wish he'd get off the fence...
I understand what your saying but both are still top players but not what they were.
so why would a club like man city be after a messi & ronaldo ? it would not be for football reasons
i never understood the messi transfer attempt by city other than shirts and media/image rights
what would manchester city be getting out of a deal for a messi or ronaldo
because we know both players would make the most money out of a deal. man city take would be as little as 5% profit if their was any profit to be made at all from shirts and image rights after the wages handed out
city don't need a statement player anymore we have our own in phil foden ? the lad can reach the heights at manchester city and will grow and grow
daztrueblue91
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 4,102
he is now a statement show man you roll out to sell shirts and tickets
being a effective player is long gone just like messi
Messi got 28 goals and 9 assists in 34 league games last season. He also got 4 goals and 5 assists in the Copa America.
Ronaldo got 29 goals and 3 assists in 33 league games. He also got 5 goals and 1 assist in the Euros.
If these stats are not considered as ‘effective’, I’d love to know what is.
So if we could not get Kane of Haaland for whatever reason you would not take Messi or Ronaldo on a short term deal, 1 yr with an option of a 2nd?so why would a club like man city be after a messi & ronaldo ? it would not be for football reasons
i never understood the messi transfer attempt by city other than shirts and media/image rights
what would manchester city be getting out of a deal for a messi or ronaldo
because we know both players would make the most money out of a deal. man city take would be as little as 5% profit if their was any profit to be made at all from shirts and image rights after the wages handed out
city don't need a statement player anymore we have our own in phil foden ? the lad can reach the heights at manchester city and will grow and grow
Ronaldo would score goals for fun in this team.
So if we could not get Kane of Haaland for whatever reason you would not take Messi or Ronaldo on a short term deal, 1 yr with an option of a 2nd?
Ronaldo would score goals for fun in this team.
but at a cost and nothing in club football is worth his wages short term ? manchester city are bigger than any player. paying crazy wages for a messi or ronaldo would hurt the club long term
Messi got 28 goals and 9 assists in 34 league games last season. He also got 4 goals and 5 assists in the Copa America.
Ronaldo got 29 goals and 3 assists in 33 league games. He also got 5 goals and 1 assist in the Euros.
If these stats are not considered as ‘effective’, I’d love to know what is.
again at what cost did both clubs have to stump up ? both Juventus and barcelona are in a financial mess
- Status
- Not open for further replies.