SOR_21
Member
Cheaper than Kane and buys some time for a new striker.
Don't think we'd need to pay anything close to that but it's an interesting opportunityI’d pay 100m for him right now. He guarantees us the title for the next two years and a minimum of one champions league.
The best player of the last 15 years, bar none.
No apologies needed mate. I wasn't having a pop at you personally btw.Its a forum which is only based on nothing else but opinions mate. I din't put it up as a fact, but if it came across like that my apologies. According to me there is no way Ronaldo comes here/we go for him (while we could have gone for Messi) and then adding Haaland on top of him.
What new striker? There is probably 3 in the world good enough to play for us. Kane, Lewandowski and Haaland. Kane is the only one interested.Cheaper than Kane and buys some time for a new striker.
We've had plenty of ex United players. It's not the most absurd idea of Ronaldo as a stop gap. He would be quite cheap to obtainFuck right off, he's a smarmy all about me me me me player, wouldn't want him anywhere near the club, and I personally dont think he would "tarnish" his united links ,because when his career is finished there's money to be made off the back of united for him
He didn't say "no." Quite the politician/public relations professional answer. ;)Don't be a party pooper.