Dribble
Well-Known Member
Likewise mate, but seriously, is your only objection to the possibility of signing Ronaldo that he used to play for those who must not be mentioned?I completely disagree mate, but I can only respect your opinion.
Likewise mate, but seriously, is your only objection to the possibility of signing Ronaldo that he used to play for those who must not be mentioned?I completely disagree mate, but I can only respect your opinion.
A long time agoHas Ronaldo's rape accusation in the US actually been closed?
No. We’ve had plenty of players cross over the divide, some more successfully than others.Likewise mate, but seriously, is your only objection to the possibility of signing Ronaldo that he used to play for those who must not be mentioned?
Not sure you should be sharing that. ;-)No. We’ve had plenty of players cross over the divide, some more successfully than others.
Ronaldo is an arrogant, egotistical, self obsessed prick. He’s everything that United resemble, and I don’t want our club associated with that.
Our latest documentary is called Together, which I believe embodies the NDA of this squad. Ronaldo is all about himself.
I have no problem letting him use us for one or two seasons if it means getting goals scored. He hasn’t been disruptive at Juventus at all. Very professional guy. I don’t like him and never have. Same as Ramos. But can see how it would work. Also, at his age, maybe he wouldn’t have a problem being on the bench sometimes? That works for Pep.Why on earth any blue would want that c**nt anywhere near city is beyond me
You just don’t get it mate ,and I carnt be arsed explainingI have no problem letting him use us for one or two seasons if it means getting goals scored. He hasn’t been disruptive at Juventus at all. Very professional guy. I don’t like him and never have. Same as Ramos. But can see how it would work. Also, at his age, maybe he wouldn’t have a problem being on the bench sometimes? That works for Pep.
I’ve said before that having a UCL winner in the squad would help a lot in the competition. And he’s a serial winner. We have Portuguese national team players who would make him feel welcome.
It would also make us appealing to global audience like PSG, for having that global star.
But anyway, if people are so easily against having a player who is easily one of the best European footballers of all time playing for us for being related to another English team, then I feel even better about being against Kane for an obscene amount of money
Don’t get what? That he’s connected to United? What that means? Of course I do. And I couldn’t care less. United isn’t in his identity. It may be why some here hate him, but he’s all about himself, and the club he will be known for is Madrid.You just don’t get it mate ,and I carnt be arsed explaining
I've never met the Geezer, so couldn't say. I judge everyone on how they treat me to be honest. I've had warnings about people I've subsequently met & some have been spot on, some over egged & others waaaaaay off the mark. To be honest, the same has happened to me.No. We’ve had plenty of players cross over the divide, some more successfully than others.
Ronaldo is an arrogant, egotistical, self obsessed prick. He’s everything that United resemble, and I don’t want our club associated with that.
Our latest documentary is called Together, which I believe embodies the NDA of this squad. Ronaldo is all about himself.
Ba Dumm…TssssSince United is your club, you should ask yourself that.