OB1
Well-Known Member
Prestwich_Blue said:And if we can see it, why the fuck can't the man who's paid £3.5m a year see it?BigJoe#1 said:Prestwich_Blue said:Absolutely. The essential outcome tonight was to get 3 points. Nothing more, nothing less, even it that meant winning a bit ugly. I was a bit surprised that he didn't change things at half time, with us being 2-0 up. Take off Dzeko or Aguero, bring on Clichy and push Kolarov into midfield then get Milner to sit in front of Zabaleta. Take Toure off and bring Fernandinho on, pushing Silva up behind the striker. Then we've got two banks of 4 who can all defend, but with options (in Milner, Kolarov and 'Dinho) to go forward if we get a good chance.
But we did exactly what we laughed at Liverpool for doing at Palace last season and chased the game when we really needed to control it and hang onto what we had. I'm absolutely furious with Pellegrini and I hope Txiki kicks his arse all the way back home for that.
Good suggestion there PB, on all counts, substitutions, tactics and arse kicking!
Different people see different things. I would only have changed things when CSKA started to gain some traction in the game and I would have taken Dzeko off and brought Dinho on.
The idea that Pellegrini can't see things fans does is specious; Pellegrini chooses to do things in a particular way and he won two trophies doing it last season.
He may decide to be more pragmatic in the UCL at some point; just as he did with Malaga. You asked earlier if someone would challenge your idea that he had taken us as far as he could? Well, he went further in the UCL with two weaker sides than City so history suggests that he can go further with City.
The problem that I am sure he is grappling with is playing as he would against stronger opposition against weaker opposition: he has not resorted to that level of pragmatism yet; he may have to but I do not think he will rush into it.