inchy14
Well-Known Member
Damocles said:Mister Appointment said:Damocles said:For the people who are suggesting that we were robbed by a penalty decision, are they also taking into account how we were given an offside goal?
You can't have it both ways. You can't whinge about how officiating cost us when also not acknowledging that it greatly helped us. As Mister Appointment so elquently pointed out, that shit is what the rags and the rest of the wankers do.
The difference between the offside and the penalty decisions is pretty clear. The offside was so marginal even the replays are pretty much inconclusive because even if Zaba's a few inches in front of his marker, the centre half seems to be in line with him when the ball is played. Was pointed out in the after match analysis I watched. This is very different from the penalty incidents which were clear and visible in real time.
True but they both fall under the heading of bad decisions by the officials that benefited one of the teams.
I mean what exactly are people suggesting here? That there is a conspiracy amongst European referees to give bad decisions against City?
We're in the same position Chelsea found themselves a few years ago....
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/9210571/Chelsea-v-Barcelona-The-controversial-battle-of-the-Bridge-in-2009-Champions-League-semi-final.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... final.html</a>
People are hoping we fail because we're not one of the big boys, yet.
And compare the reporting from last night to when the rags got knocked out by Mourinho's Madrid side with Nani getting sent off, the whole of the countries press were up in arms for a correct decision given against them whilst we are ridiculed in most quarters.
Poor second half yes but the ref does his job properly then it's likely to be 3-0 at half time or 2-1 at the end, he didn't and ultimately it cost us, and please don't anyone start about the offside, not one of their players appealed it was that close and the benefit always should go with the attacker.