BingoBango said:Balti said:As a parent with one kid at uni and another hopefully heading there I can categorically state that I do not want my kids to start life saddled with so much debt. It is just morally wrong. I know i am banging on about it but it is also wrong that my mates scottish kids will start their working life with no debt at all. It is even more wrong that scottish MPs voted for my kids to start life with this debt while kids in their scottish constituencies are laughing at English kids and their massive debts. Wrong on so many levels.
This isn't true, unless your mate has a few quid. I did my undergrad degree in Scotland and though fees were covered, most folk still have to take out a loan from the Student Loan Company to cover living costs. I came from a low-income family, and owe the SLC about £18k. Most of my friends from there owe a similar amount.
The principle of one part of the country paying fees, and another not having to do so, I agree is wholly unfair. But kids doing their degrees will end up in significant amounts of debt unless their parents are well-off.
Fair comment.
It's 'just' the extra £9,000 per annum in tuition fees that is the difference between two countries that are allegedly part of the same 'united' kingdom.
Kids in Scotland are going to start work with significantly less debt than kids in England even if they still incur a similar additional debt from living costs.
Scottish MPs voted on this. Some even voted for it to their hypocritical shame.
Thats not a fair democracy in my book. England = the poor relation of the 'united' kingdom.