You can get to the roots of most of the worlds ills by reading the Financial Times.Is there any media outlet that is universally accepted as fair and factual by all factions? Any?
I've stopped reading the Mail and the Guardian. Both seem to have declined into caricatures of their former selves.
Yep, I've read before that the FT is probably the most balanced news reporting but it is relatively expensive and lacks sports and entertainment sections (which are important especially if you like a good quiz).You can get to the roots of most of the worlds ills by reading the Financial Times.
I'd go with the FT. They remain factual over chasing click baitYep, I've read before that the FT is probably the most balanced news reporting but it is relatively expensive and lacks sports and entertainment sections (which are important especially if you like a good quiz).
What's wrong with The Guardian - apart from City coverage that is!Is there any media outlet that is universally accepted as fair and factual by all factions? Any?
I've stopped reading the Mail and the Guardian. Both seem to have declined into caricatures of their former selves.
I just read the front page on the bbcYep, I've read before that the FT is probably the most balanced news reporting but it is relatively expensive and lacks sports and entertainment sections (which are important especially if you like a good quiz).
they do let themselves down badly with that. i read the online version but refuse to pay them a penny until they revise their editorial approach to City. I do like a fair amount of what they do other than that.What's wrong with The Guardian - apart from City coverage that is!
I think it has declined into left leaning populism with simplistic bigoted viewpoints. i.e poor people = good, rich people = bad, which then leads into islam = good, black/brown = good, white = bad, jews = bad. It seems to judge people on their group attachments rather than treating everyone as an individual. One of my friends calls it 'preachy' and I do think it has an arrogant superiority (similar to the Mail) about it. And yes, it also has the spiteful Ronay and Liew spewing their condescending bollocks about City!What's wrong with The Guardian - apart from City coverage that is!
I’m similar but also refer to their ‘Papers’, where you can see the front pages for the next day. This tells me how they are trying to frame certain subjects.I just read the front page on the bbc
Same here, every morning.I’m similar but also refer to their ‘Papers’, where you can see the front pages for the next day. This tells me how they are trying to frame certain subjects.
Take the Mail headline for today, ‘Le Humiliation!’. Without even reading it, my take would be that they forget the previous government(s) austerity measures and paint it as the current government failing in the defence of the realm. Aided and abetted by various quotes from the right wing parties, slamming the government for the shit show that they actually created.
Oh, and which the Mail supported and promoted during 14 years of cuts.
I’m similar but also refer to their ‘Papers’, where you can see the front pages for the next day. This tells me how they are trying to frame certain subjects.
Take the Mail headline for today, ‘Le Humiliation!’. Without even reading it, my take would be that they forget the previous government(s) austerity measures and paint it as the current government failing in the defence of the realm. Aided and abetted by various quotes from the right wing parties, slamming the government for the shit show that they actually created.
Oh, and which the Mail supported and promoted during 14 years of cuts.
It’s also where their current thinking is, like their full support to Trump, only to backtrack when they realise the country isn’t with them.Funny enough when ever I hear the tory party moaning about things I always turn to the missus and say " they had 14 fucking years to sort it, couldn't, then expect labour to solve it in 12 months"
I think Times Radio is pretty good. Generally unbiased though it does have some obviously tribal presenters. The best of a bad bunch though.Is there any media outlet that is universally accepted as fair and factual by all factions? Any?
I've stopped reading the Mail and the Guardian. Both seem to have declined into caricatures of their former selves.
Get with the narrative, Starmer and the Labour government are to blame for everything . Heard the Tory transport shadow minister pontificating this morning about pot holes , bus lanes , 20mph speed limits etc etc , apparently these problems have only been around for the last eighteen months.Funny enough when ever I hear the tory party moaning about things I always turn to the missus and say " they had 14 fucking years to sort it, couldn't, then expect labour to solve it in 12 months"
It’s a bit suss these missing/murdered US government/research employees ….. but I don’t think they would target Mr G. Neville.lol. Not sure how I feel about that! And these I’m sure fine gentleman probably won’t film them selves doing it……. If they ever did!![]()
Speculation about 'missing scientists' is 'denigrating to their memories,' widow says
Conspiracies are running rampant online after the deaths or disappearances of at least 10 people tied to sensitive US research.www.bbc.co.uk
@Moss_side_lad
Initially read that as Radio Times………pretty reliableI think Times Radio is pretty good. Generally unbiased though it does have some obviously tribal presenters. The best of a bad bunch though.