Agreed but also reports we want 69m euros for Jesus from Juve.
They want a loan with payment next summer.
So probably a loan fee to add to the transfer.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Danny Ings
- Thread starter better dead than red
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
They want a loan with payment next summer.
So probably a loan fee to add to the transfer.
He’s a real clinical finisher. Penalty box finisher if we did sign him to lead the line I think he would score a lot more goals than people realise. Especially with the creators we have in this team. Just injuries. I also think he would join us with a hunger for trophies and wanting to prove people wrong.
12 goals last season and 4 assists , (injuries appeared this season)
22 goals the season before that and 2 assist
12 goals last season and 4 assists , (injuries appeared this season)
22 goals the season before that and 2 assist
xgorton
Well-Known Member
6/1 good odds.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
There speaks a man who’s never tried Lidl’s herrings in sour cream with apple and dill.Gone shopping from Harrods to Lidl
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 14,570
Perfect time to buy him. Older and injuries started appearing.He’s a real clinical finisher. Penalty box finisher if we did sign him to lead the line I think he would score a lot more goals than people realise. Especially with the creators we have in this team. Just injuries. I also think he would join us with a hunger for trophies and wanting to prove people wrong.
12 goals last season and 4 assists , (injuries appeared this season)
22 goals the season before that and 2 assist
Ffs.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
And we got our money back. He thrilled us for 3/4 of a season or whatever with goals and assists, so in my book, was a worthwhile signing. A consummate team player who peaked with us.Negredo had a more positive effect on City over half a season than most players we've signed. He raised the roof.
I don’t care what he did off field, that's his own business.
Ings could do a proper job as a stop gap in the event we can’t get our top target(s) this window. Whilst we exceeded every expectation without a regular striker last year, it would be foolish to bet on the same again.
Would he sign for us on that basis? At a reasonable transfer fee? No idea.
philjoneswho?
Well-Known Member
You seem to have your finger on the pulse with these :). I’ve seen we were loaning him but no mention of fees etc. I think I’d be happy with £60ish million for him. Not what he’s worth but Italian clubs plead poverty and then pay Ramsey £8m per week!Agreed but also reports we want 69m euros for Jesus from Juve.
They want a loan with payment next summer.
So probably a loan fee to add to the transfer.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
He’d never be our #1 striker and, given the choice, I’d much rather stick with Jesus.I assume our buy back clause on Nacho has passed?
I'd be happy to have him back in a flash.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Indeed I was working on the possibility of Jesus going and then DFI v Nacho.He’d never be our #1 striker and, given the choice, I’d much rather stick with Jesus.
philjoneswho?
Well-Known Member
You said it man. Nobody fucks with the Jesus!He’d never be our #1 striker and, given the choice, I’d much rather stick with Jesus.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Anyone entertaining the idea of this needs a head wobble
It's so ridiculous it can't be true
Why? Are you judging him as a long term alternative to Kane and Haaland or have you considered all eventualities?
Feel free to make some semi-intelligent analysis rather than yet another throw-away comment.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Understood.Indeed I was working on the possibility of Jesus going and then DFI v Nacho.
On this one I just think potentially paying 40m for a stop gap is too much. He's got his injury problems and although definitely knows where the back of the net is, playing up front for City is much more than standing around hoping to gobble up chances. The workrate required in a Pep team doesn't suit Ings, certainly not at this stage of his career.Why? Are you judging him as a long term alternative to Kane and Haaland or have you considered all eventualities?
Feel free to make some semi-intelligent analysis rather than yet another throw-away comment.
If we were to lose Jesus as well as Aguero and only replace them with Ings I believe we are much weaker in the forward department going into next season.
Good luck to him though, no problem with him as a player, just don't think he provides us with what we need moving forward.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
On this one I just think potentially paying 40m for a stop gap is too much. He's got his injury problems and although definitely knows where the back of the net is, playing up front for City is much more than standing around hoping to gobble up chances. The workrate required in a Pep team doesn't suit Ings, certainly not at this stage of his career.
If we were to lose Jesus as well as Aguero and only replace them with Ings I believe we are much weaker in the forward department going into next season.
Good luck to him though, no problem with him as a player, just don't think he provides us with what we need moving forward.
Great. A reasoned post. If only we could flush one out from the part-time sniper I quoted.
Last edited:
Don't want Kane either. Maybe just maybe I think Danny ings is shit and needless. Would rather give Torres a go or promote one of the kids. Better than pissing away £40m quidWhy? Are you judging him as a long term alternative to Kane and Haaland or have you considered all eventualities?
Feel free to make some semi-intelligent analysis rather than yet another throw-away comment.
Oh and feel free to not go around aiming snide throwaway comments like the one you aimed from nowhere at Prestwich Blue the other day.
Works both ways you know
The Fat el Hombre
Well-Known Member
Where are you guys getting 40 million from for the transfer fee? I thought Southampton were/are asking for 25-30 million
They have their own personal chef?Not what he’s worth but Italian clubs plead poverty and then pay Ramsey £8m per week!
Only going off what I've seen mooted, though in fairness I've seen fees rising from anywhere between 30/40m.Where are you guys getting 40 million from for the transfer fee? I thought Southampton were/are asking for 25-30 million
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Oh, they are both shit. That ends all argument then.Don't want Kane either. Maybe just maybe I think Danny ings is shit and needless. Would rather give Torres a go or promote one of the kids. Better than pissing away £40m quid
Oh and feel free to not go around aiming snide throwaway comments like the one you aimed from nowhere at Prestwich Blue the other day.
Works both ways you know
Oh, and by the way, when some random knob pops up with a dig, they can expect both barrels. If you can’t take it, feel free to crawl back under your rock.
They are skint and IF Jesus or for that matter Bernardo do want to move on, we could not have wished for a worse time to sell them.You seem to have your finger on the pulse with these :). I’ve seen we were loaning him but no mention of fees etc. I think I’d be happy with £60ish million for him. Not what he’s worth but Italian clubs plead poverty and then pay Ramsey £8m per week!
We are fortunate that we are not desperate for cash and from an accounting point of view, it MAY be an advantage to have guaranteed payments arriving at a later date.
With extra loan fees on top it also COULD result in a better deal for us.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.