Danny Ings

Status
Not open for further replies.
True but current international standards are the lowest they have ever been.

City would hammer this Brazilian side and all International sides for that matter.

And the same applies to all the top Premier sides, International football is no longer the best.


But isnt that because club football especially the biggest clubs in the world can take players from all around the world.
 
Depends on what you mean by a lot, but there has been a lot on Ings too, and earlier than Kane. By the same people in the media. My point is more about reactions than listing comparisons though.

When the links with Ings started, we instantly dismissed them. No way are we replacing Sergio with a 28 year old. It is just his agent looking for a better deal. Scores a lot but not the profile. etc etc.

Kane is also 28. Ok in a few days for the technicality lot, but 28 when he signs and plays for us.

The links with Kane really started when his interview was released, and that was recieved as anywhere between 'this has been done for some time' and 'he must at least have some encouragement from us to say that publicly'.

Ings offically turns down a 4 year improved contract offer from Southampton. But that can't he must have had some encouragement from somehere to do that, with us being the club most strongly linked club.

The club hasn't denied the links to Kane (we most often don't anyway). So that must mean we Are in for him. The club hasn't denied the links to Ings either. means nothing. Means nothing in both cases for me fwiw.

We readily believe that we would pay over double our transfer record, just like that, for a very very good player that scores lots of goals in the league. But wouldn't pay some 25-30m for a very good player that scores lots of goals im the league, of the same age. Who happens to be easier to get with only a year left on his contract and at a club known for selling more readily.

Again, for clarity, not that i believe we wre in for ings, or in for ings over Kane, and i certainly would've want Ings over kane. I just think we are very selective with what is out there to suit the players we fancy. Myself included at times, although I do try at least notice the parity.


Just to be pedantic Ings is 29 tomorrow.
Kane will be 28 in 6 days time.

8-)
 
Just to be pedantic Ings is 29 tomorrow

Touche.

Well i timed that right then!

Fair enough, I had thought the above for some time, didn't bother to check before posting. Hardly makes a huge difference, relatively. Kane is obviously by far the better player irrespective of age.
 
Sounds like you're being a bit of a WUM. Jesus is top quality, always will be. He's been first choice for Brazil for years. Have a look at previous posts and looks at his goals per games ratio. Up there with some of the best in Europe.
Yeah and Brazil are shite now as we will see in the World Cup. Not winding anyone up the amount of delusion it comes to when talking about this kid is off the scale he’s just a runner and not actually that good hence why he’s going to be sold.

he’s half way to a testimonial and people still don’t know his best position is that not telling? Not good enough simple as that, as a striker ings is actually a better player but he’s only slightly less shit.
 
Wait, i thought it was all done and going to be announced before the Euros. Then it was all done and going to be announced immediately after the euros. Then all done and announced when he's back from holiday. What, now it's all done and waiting to be announced bar their finding a replacement and us shifting Jesus? What's next, all done and announced as soon as terms are agreed and spurs accept a fee?

You'd give the Italian twitterati a run for their money. Either that or your brother seems to be winding you up mate.
Sounds like you’re just as delusional about Kane signing as you was Messi coming here... god that did make me laugh for a good few weeks pal talk about kidding yourself.

Do you think if you repeat the same deluded stuff 10x every day that it will come true like some form of witchcraft?

Haaland isn’t signing here.... Messi was never signing here.... Kane is signed here and will be announced soon, enjoy the season and get with the real world pal.
 
Touche.

Well i timed that right then!

Fair enough, I had thought the above for some time, didn't bother to check before posting. Hardly makes a huge difference, relatively. Kane is obviously by far the better player irrespective of age.


We could buy both but we`d have to expand the treatment room. Ha-ha thats what we`re doing with the pair land and the City campus. The casino and the other stuff were just a smoke screen. 8-}
 
Sounds like you’re just as delusional about Kane signing as you was Messi coming here... god that did make me laugh for a good few weeks pal talk about kidding yourself.

Do you think if you repeat the same deluded stuff 10x every day that it will come true like some form of witchcraft?

Haaland isn’t signing here.... Messi was never signing here.... Kane is signed here and will be announced soon, enjoy the season and get with the real world pal.
What about Grealish, is that a “don’t know”?
 
Sounds like you’re just as delusional about Kane signing as you was Messi coming here... god that did make me laugh for a good few weeks pal talk about kidding yourself.

Do you think if you repeat the same deluded stuff 10x every day that it will come true like some form of witchcraft?

Haaland isn’t signing here.... Messi was never signing here.... Kane is signed here and will be announced soon, enjoy the season and get with the real world pal.

You enjoy the season too, pal, whoever we end up signing.
 
I`m starting to think that Ings being leaked is a sure sign we have Kane.

I didn`t want Kane because of his age, injury record, his potential zero resale and having to deal with Levy but now would love to get Kane so we don`t get Ings.

How very very cunning City 8-}
 
But isnt that because club football especially the biggest clubs in the world can take players from all around the world.
Exactly, the standard of club football has gone through the roof, in terms of the major clubs in the major leagues.

But also the standard of the recent crop of Brazilians has fallen to what is once was.
 
I`m starting to think that Ings being leaked is a sure sign we have Kane.

I didn`t want Kane because of his age, injury record, his potential zero resale and having to deal with Levy but now would love to get Kane so we don`t get Ings.

How very very cunning City 8-}
My take is IF we get Kane, Jesus may well want out and the Juve rumours are true.

If that is the case Ings may be the back up striker to Kane, that is, if Ings is happy to play that role.
 
Statistics don't tell you the full story.

Great lad, works himself into the ground but never a serious goal threat for me, goes on long runs of not scoring and when misses chances his head and confidence drops alarmingly.

And please stop with the Brazilian International, they are a distant shadow of a one wonderful team, they are very average, even by International standards.
small time thinking?

Full Brazilian international happy to spend time on the bench?

He is too good a player not to be first choice , at his age he needs regular football.
Seems like you change your mind a lot @Keeper! , top message today and the other last week, are Brazil a top international side and player, or are they not ?
 
Seems like you change your mind a lot @Keeper! , top message today and the other last week, are Brazil a top international side and player, or are they not ?
He is too good a player to sit on a bench and I could understand if he wanted to move on and be a no1 at another club.

Do I think he will ever be No1 at our club? not for me.

Would I like him to stay as back up, yes I would.

Great lad, never fault him for effort, but ultimately in my opinion he lacks that killer instinct and total belief a top striker has to have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top