mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
You know what this arguing is like? it's like Ramsey's kitchen nightmares where Ramsey is brought in to improve a restaurant.
He comes in and identifies problem areas, and all of a sudden, the owner keeps arguing that nothing is wrong - in which case, nothing can be improved.
The moment he says the menus isn't right, or the soup tastes crap, the owner gets upset.
It's not moaning to say Fernando might be a weakness and could KdB or Delph give us something he can't. The positive is suggesting ways KdB or Delph might change things, but if you only want to see the negative, you'll focus on the Fernando criticism.
If we bring in KdB - someone else in the team will be moved out. There's no two ways about it. It's two sides of the same coin. KdB is the improvement, so who is the weakness we're fixing?
It really isn't all negative.
So is it moaning when
I am not, i am not the one swearing and calling people stupid. At least debate and talk instead of swearing and name calling.
What your doing is categorising players as being not good enough based on your opinion and then expecting everyone to agree with you. You have no idea how each and every player will play this year for us, but you want to debate because you think you have seen into the future. Calling one of ours a "bag of shite" (apologies if it was your keyboard partner ealier on) will really endear you to us all. As I said, you do not know what lies ahead and we may already have tomorrows worldies just breaking into the team.
Finally, if you want to hi jack a threat and discuss why City appear to dissapoint, at leat have the courtesy to use the correct thread so us mere morsels looking for tansfer news can do so without you deraiing it.
Thank you.